To: | Balchem Corporation (mstach@balchem.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 97008500 - JUNETEENTH - Juneteenth |
Sent: | December 22, 2021 01:53:21 PM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 97008500
Mark: JUNETEENTH
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Balchem Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. Juneteenth
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: December 22, 2021
The referenced application and the November 22, 2021 Response to Letter of Suspension have been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.
Pursuant to TMEP §§705.01, 707.03, and 713.02, applicant is advised of the following status of the application. In a Suspension Notice dated November 3, 2021, the application was suspended until prior-filed application Serial No. 90782135 either registers or abandons.
Applicant responded to the suspension by proposing an identification amendment that excludes the goods in the prior pending application, specifically, “Flavor enhancers used in food and beverage products; Bakery goods and dessert items, namely, cakes, cookies, pastries, and frozen confections for retail and wholesale distribution and consumption on or off the premises excluding candies and popcorn”.
This argument is not persuasive. The attached Internet evidence, consisting of screenshots from Laduree, Chocolate by E, and Barbara’s Cookie Gifts & Flavors establishes that the same entity commonly relevant goods and markets the goods under the same mark. Thus, applicant’s and registrant’s goods are considered related for likelihood of confusion purposes. See, e.g., In re Davey Prods. Pty Ltd., 92 USPQ2d 1198, 1202-04 (TTAB 2009); In re Toshiba Med. Sys. Corp., 91 USPQ2d 1266, 1268-69, 1271-72 (TTAB 2009). Applicant’s excluding of the goods from the identification does not render the goods unrelated since consumers would nonetheless reasonably expect them to emanate from the same source. Therefore, the application remain suspended until prior-filed application Serial No. 90782135 either registers or abandons.
The application is suspended for the reason specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
The pending application below has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark. 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.02(c). Action on this application is suspended until the prior-filed application below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c). Information relevant to the application below is provided in this letter.
- U.S. Application Serial No. 90782135
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Elena Kravtsoff/
Elena Kravtsoff
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 113, USPTO
(571) 272-3233
elena.kravtsoff@uspto.gov