SCOUT
Fusion Trade, Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 90975047 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 3000: Illustration: Drawing or design which also includes word(s)/ letter(s)/number(s) |
| Attorney Name | Matthew M. Yospin |
| Attorney Docket Number | FWW020TMus |
| Law Office Assigned | L50 |
| Employee Name | BUTTON, JENNIFER JO |
Timeline
| 2020-06-29 | Application Filed |
| 2020-09-30 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2021-01-26 | Location: TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2021-01-26 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Fusion Trade, Inc. |
| Address | One Marina Park Drive, Suite 305 Boston DE 02210 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | DE |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Design Search Codes
| 260521 | Triangles that are completely or partially shaded |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 39 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,105 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The mark consists of the stylized word SCOUT and a horizontally-elongated isosceles triangle woven with the letters O, U, and T. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2020-07-02 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2020-07-28 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2020-07-29 | 3 MDSC E:E-Mail |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2020-09-30 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | 2020-09-30 | 5 CNSL R:Renewal |
| LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2020-09-30 | 6 GNSL F:First Action |
| NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | 2020-09-30 | 7 GNS3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2020-11-02 | 8 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2021-01-26 | 9 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2020-11-02 | 10 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2021-01-26 | 11 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | 2021-01-27 | 12 MDSC E:E-Mail |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2021-07-22 | 13 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2022-02-14 | 14 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2022-08-22 | 15 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2023-03-15 | 16 RCSC S: |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2023-03-29 | 17 RCSC S: |
| TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | 2023-05-02 | 18 COAR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | 2023-05-02 | 19 REAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | 2023-05-02 | 20 ARAA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2023-05-02 | 21 TCCA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | 2023-05-02 | 22 CHAN I:Incoming Correspondence |
| REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | 2023-11-29 | 23 RCSC S: |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 