CLOBOTICS IRIS
Shanghai Clobotics Technology Co., Ltd.
Mark For: CLOBOTICS IRIS™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 90749981 |
| Mark Literal Elements | CLOBOTICS IRIS |
| Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
| Mark Type | Service Mark |
| Current Location | NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING 2021-06-05 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Domestic Representative | Julianne Abelman |
| Attorney Name | Julianne Abelman |
| Attorney Docket Number | 880699 |
Timeline
| 2021-06-02 | Application Filed |
| 2021-06-05 | Location: NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING |
| 2021-06-05 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2021-06-05 | Status: New application will be assigned to an examining attorney approximately 3 months after filing date. |
| 2021-06-05 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Shanghai Clobotics Technology Co., Ltd. |
| Address | 3-22 Room, 1st Building, 1107 Yu Yuan Rd Chang Ning District Shanghai CHINA - |
| Legal Entity Type | Limited Company (ltd.) |
| Legal Entity State | CHINA |
Documents
 Application | MULTI | 2021-06-02 |
 Drawing | IMAGE/JPEG | 2021-06-02 |
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 42 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,101 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0421 | Design and development of computer hardware; design and development of computer software; design and development of computer software for online photography; design and development of computer software for photography using remote systems; design and development of computer software for data processing from images; design and development of computer software for use with camera drones; design and development of mobile application software; Product design and development in the field of camera drones; design and development of the artificial intelligence, namely, design and development of artificial intelligence computer hardware and software; Product design and development in the field of machine visional processing systems; consultancy in relation to the design and development of computer hardware; consultancy in relation to the design and development of computer software; consultancy in the field of auxiliary design for wind turbines for electric energy; engineering consultancy in relation to the performance and maintenance of wind turbines for electric; engineering consultancy in relation to artificial intelligence computer hardware and software; engineering consultancy in relation to machine visional processing system |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2021-06-05 |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 CLOBOTICS IRIS 90749981 not registered Live/Pending |
Shanghai Clobotics Technology Co., Ltd. 2021-06-02 |
 CLOBOTICS IRIS 90325765 not registered Live/Pending |
Shanghai Clobotics Technology Co., Ltd. 2020-11-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 