Research | OneLook Acronym Finder |
Serial Number | 90676828 |
Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
Attorney Name | Yaakov Y. Citrin, Esq. |
Attorney Docket Number | 60185.0001TM |
2021-02-04 | Date of First Use |
2021-04-28 | Application Filed |
2021-07-26 | Status: Live/Pending |
2021-08-03 | Transaction Date |
Owner: | Fit Kit Brands, LLC |
Address | 6679 Peachtree Industrial Blvd, Suite M Norcross GA 30092 |
Legal Entity Type | Limited Liability Company |
Legal Entity State | GA |
Application | MULTI | 2021-04-28 |
Drawing | JPEG | 2021-04-28 |
Specimen | JPEG | 2021-04-28 |
International Codes: | 35 |
U.S. Codes: | 100,101,102 |
Type Code | Type |
---|---|
GS0351 | Service for providing an employee wellness kit program for companies, the kit program including delivering wellness kits to employees of the companies and configuring contents of the wellness kits from a predetermined list of vendors and products from the vendors, where the employee wellness kit program includes access to a web marketplace that enables employee recipients of the wellness kits to see a list of vendors that provide items for the wellness kits and to access promotions and discounts by the vendors that provide the items for the kits |
Description | Date | Event Coding |
---|---|---|
NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2021-08-02 | 1 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2021-12-28 | 2 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2021-12-28 | 3 CNRT R:Renewal |
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2021-12-28 | 4 GNRT F:First Action |
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2021-12-28 | 5 GNRN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2022-06-29 | 6 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2022-06-28 | 7 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2022-06-28 | 8 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2022-06-29 | 9 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | 2022-06-29 | 10 AMPX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2022-07-20 | 11 CNFR R:Renewal |
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2022-07-20 | 12 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2022-07-20 | 13 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2022-12-14 | 14 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2022-12-14 | 15 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2022-12-15 | 16 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | 2022-12-19 | 17 RRDX W: |
ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | 2022-12-19 | 18 RDX1 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | 2022-12-19 | 19 RDX3 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2023-04-04 | 20 ABN0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2023-04-04 | 21 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | 2023-04-04 | 22 MAB0 O:Outgoing Correspondence |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.