To: | Honeywell International Inc. (tmdocket@leasonellis.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90674932 - SYSTEM SENSOR - 310097-US0 |
Sent: | August 20, 2021 12:01:55 PM |
Sent As: | ecom116@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90674932
Mark: SYSTEM SENSOR
|
|
Correspondence Address: ONE BARKER AVENUE, FIFTH FLOOR
|
|
Applicant: Honeywell International Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 310097-US0
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 20, 2021
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search Results
Identification of Goods
“Remote annunciators” is unclear. The type of annunciator must be stated as in “remote electrical annunciators.”
“Relay bases” is unclear. The specific type of base must be stated as in “electric relay bases.”
“Sounder bases” is unclear. This wording does not appear in the Manual of Acceptable Identifications. A search further reveals that this wording also does not appear on the Principal Register. The applicant must provide the common commercial name of this item, or a brief explanation. If accurate, the applicant may adopt “sound detector base sold as an integral part of smoke detectors.”
“Isolator bases” is unclear. This wording does not appear in the Manual of Acceptable Identifications. A search further reveals that this wording also does not appear on the Principal Register. The applicant must provide the common commercial name of this item, or a brief explanation. If accurate, the applicant may adopt “isolator base for isolating a short circuit sold as an integral part of smoke detectors.”
“Relays” is vague. The specific type of relay must be stated as in “electrical relays” or “coaxial relays.”
“Detector sensitivity test tools” is unclear. This wording does not appear in the Manual of Acceptable Identifications. A search further reveals that this wording also does not appear on the Principal Register. The applicant must provide the common commercial name of this item, or a brief explanation. If multiple “tools” are intended, the applicant must supply the common commercial name for each.
“Monitor” is vague. The type of monitor must be stated as in “computer monitors.”
“Control modules” is unclear. The type of module and the device being controlled must be named as in “remote control transmitter for radio-controlled devices.”
“Horns” is unclear. Horns as musical instruments belong in Class 15. If accurate, the applicant may adopt “electronic warning horn sold as an integral component of smoke detectors” in Class 9.
“Strobes” is vague. A “flashing strobe light apparatus” belongs in Class 11. Alternatively, the applicant may adopt “fire alarm and emergency evacuation devices, namely, strobes” in Class 9.
“Chimes” is unclear. Chimes as musical instruments belong in Class 15. Alternatively, the applicant may adopt “fire alarm and emergency evacuation devices, namely, chimes” in Class 9.
“Speakers” is unclear. The type of speaker must be stated. If accurate, the applicant may adopt “fire alarm and emergency evacuation devices, namely, chimes” in Class 9.
“Directional sounders” is unclear. This wording does not appear in the Manual of Acceptable Identifications. A search further reveals that this wording also does not appear on the Principal Register. The applicant must provide the common commercial name of this item, or a brief explanation. If accurate, the applicant may adopt “directional sound detectors sold as an integral part of smoke detectors.”
“Alarm bells” is vague. The applicant must specify that “electric alarm bells” are intended.
“Remote test switches” is unclear. The applicant must state whether the switches are electric and what is being tested.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Because it is possible that, when properly identified, the goods may belong in more than one international class, information about adding classes to an application is set forth below:
Combined Applications
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (for example, International Class 3: perfume; International Class 18: cosmetic bags sold empty).
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). Specifically, the application identifies goods based on use in commerce that are classified in at least three classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only one class. Applicant must either (a) submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or (b) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
(3) Submit verified dates of first use of the mark anywhere and in commerce for each international class. See more information about verified dates of use.
(4) Submit a specimen for each international class. The current specimen is acceptable for Class 9; and applicant needs a specimen for Classes 11 and 15. See more information about specimens.
Examples of specimens. Specimens for goods include a photograph of (1) the actual goods bearing the mark; (2) an actual container, packaging, tag or label for the goods bearing the mark; or (3) a point-of-sale display showing the mark directly associated with the goods. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c); TMEP §904.03(a)-(m). A webpage specimen submitted as a display associated with the goods must show the mark in association with a picture or textual description of the goods and include information necessary for ordering the goods. TMEP §904.03(i); see 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1), (c).
Specimens for services must show a direct association between the mark and the services and include: (1) copies of advertising and marketing material, (2) a photograph of business signage or billboards, or (3) materials showing the mark in the sale, rendering, or advertising of the services. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(2), (c); TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C).
Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed on the specimen itself, within the TEAS form that submits the specimen, or in a verified statement under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 in a later-filed response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.03(i), 1301.04(a).
(5) Submit a verified statement that “The specimen was in use in commerce on or in connection with the goods and/or services listed in the application at least as early as the filing date of the application.” See more information about verification.
See 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(a) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Multiple-class Application webpage.
General Information
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Doritt Carroll/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 116
571-272-9138
doritt.carroll@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE