Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  October 12, 2021

 

This Office Action is in reply to the applicant’s communication of September 17, 2021.  The applicant’s amended identification is not acceptable, in part, and the requirement for an acceptable identification is maintained and continued.  The applicant’s substitute specimen is acceptable and has been made of record, and the requirement is satisfied.  The applicant’s claim of ownership of its prior registration is acceptable and has been made of record, and the requirement is satisfied.  The applicant has raised a new issue regarding its drawing page which is addressed below.

 

Summary of the Issues

1.     Identification of the Services;

2.     Color Claim and Color Location.

 

Identification of the Services

The proposed amendment to the identification for International Class 25 is not acceptable because it exceeds the scope of the identification in the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6), 2.71(a); TMEP §§805, 1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.  Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Therefore, the original identification in the application, and any previously accepted amendments, remain operative for purposes of future amendment.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.07(d).

 

In this case, the application originally identified the services as follows:  “Amateur youth sports services, namely, organizing, recruiting, evaluating, scouting, promoting, and coaching basketball players and organizing basketball events, competitions, and training camps” in International Class 41.

 

However, the proposed amendment identifies the following goods:  “Basketball apparel and other clothing, namely, basketball shorts, basketball jerseys, golf shirts, hats, polo shirts, quarter zips, pullovers, sweatshirts, and t-shirts” in International Class 25. 

 

This proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because the original identification makes no claim to any type of clothing items, and thus, these goods cannot be added to the identification.  As such, the applicant’s amendment for clothing items has been deleted from the identification. 

 

Regarding the identification of the services in International Classes 35 and 41, the applicant applied for the mark ELITE for “Amateur youth sports services, namely, organizing, recruiting, evaluating, scouting, promoting, and coaching basketball players and organizing basketball events, competitions, and training camps” in International Class 41.  The applicant’s amended identification of the services in International Class 35 is acceptable as submitted.  However, the applicant has simply ignored the requirements for an acceptable identification in International Class 41.

 

Specifically, in International Class 41, the applicant must provide the common commercial name of its organized basketball events.  For example, “Amateur youth sports services, namely, scouting, and coaching basketball players and organizing basketball events, namely, basketball competitions, and basketball training camps” would be acceptable in International Class 41.

 

In the identification of services, applicant must use the common commercial or generic names for the services, be as complete and specific as possible, and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases.  TMEP §1402.03(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6).  If applicant uses indefinite words and phrases such as “services in connection with,” “including,” “and like services,” “concepts,” or “not limited to,” such wording must be followed by “namely,” and a list of each specific service identified by its common commercial or generic name.  See TMEP §1402.03(a).

 

Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: 

 

“Promoting amateur youth basketball competitions and basketball training camps; sports recruiting services in the field of high school basketball players” in International Class 35; (acceptable as amended).

 

“Amateur youth sports services, namely, scouting, and coaching basketball players and organizing basketball events, namely, basketball competitions, and basketball training camps” in International Class 41.

 

 

TMEP §§1402.01 and 1402.03.

 

 

The identification of goods or services should be clear, accurate and as concise as possible.  See Procter & Gamble Co. v. Economics Laboratory, Inc., 175 USPQ 505 (TTAB 1972); In re Cardinal Laboratories, Inc., 149 USPQ 709 (TTAB 1966); California Spray-Chemical Corp. v. Osmose Wood Preserving Co. of America, Inc., 102 USPQ 321 (Comm'r Pats. 1954); Ex parte A.C. Gilbert Co., 99 USPQ 344 (Comm'r Pats. 1953).  Furthermore, the identification of goods and services must be specific and definite.  In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 1 USPQ2d 1296 (TTAB 1986), rev'd on other grounds, 824 F.2d 957, 3 USPQ2d 1450 (Fed. Cir. 1987).

 

The examining attorney may make any requirements necessary to ensure that the identification is clear and accurate and conforms to the requirements of the statute and rules.  When an applicant has submitted an indefinite identification of goods or services, it is Office practice to suggest an acceptable identification.  However, it is the applicant's duty and prerogative to identify the goods and services.   TMEP Section 1402.01(d).

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Color Claim and Color Location Statement

In its response, the applicant provided the statement “Disclaiming colors as features of the mark.”  The applicant may not simply “disclaim” the color of the marks. 

 

Applicant must clarify whether color is a feature of the mark because, although the drawing shows the mark in color, the applicant has failed to provide and a color claim and color location statement, and, if the applicant wishes to delete its color mark, it must provide a new black and white drawing.  37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1), 2.61(b); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii).

 

Applicant may respond to this requirement by satisfying one of the following:

 

(1)       If color is not a feature of the mark, applicant must submit a black-and-white drawing of the mark to replace the color drawing.  See TMEP §807.07(a)(i).  However, any othsr amendments to the drawing will not be accepted if they materially alter the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.72; see TMEP §§807.14 et seq.  Applicant must also submit a revised description of all literal and design elements in the mark, deleting any reference to color, if appropriate.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  The following description is suggested, if accurate:  The mark consists of the scripted word "Elite" with the dot above the letter "i" consisting of an outline of the geographic depiction of the State of Indiana.

 

(2)       If color is a feature of the mark, applicant must submit a statement (a) listing all the colors that are claimed as a feature of the mark and (b) describing all the literal and design elements in the mark that specifies where each color appears in those elements.  37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii).  Generic color names must be used to describe the colors in the mark, e.g., red, yellow, blue.  TMEP §807.07(a)(i)-(ii).  If black, white, and/or gray represent background, outlining, shading, and/or transparent areas and are not part of the mark, applicant must so specify in the description.  See TMEP §807.07(d).  The following color claim and description are suggested, if accurate: 

 

Color claim:  “The colors green and white are claimed as a feature of the mark.”

 

Description:  “The mark consists of the green scripted word "Elite" with the dot above the letter "i" consisting of an outline of the geographic depiction of the State of Indiana in green.  The interior of the depiction of the State of Indiana is in white.

 

 

See TMEP §807.07(b).

 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

If the applicant has any questions, please contact the undersigned.

 

/Ty Murray/

Ty Murray

Attorney Advisor

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 113

(571) 272-9438

ty.murray@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on October 12, 2021 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90346385

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Ty Murray/

Ty Murray

Attorney Advisor

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Law Office 113

(571) 272-9438

ty.murray@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from October 12, 2021, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”