To: | Philip Morris Products S.A. (Bessinger-docket@fzlz.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90271949 - IQOS ILUMA SMARTCORE INDUCTION - PMPS 2010613 |
Sent: | January 21, 2021 04:42:13 PM |
Sent As: | ecom114@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90271949
Mark: IQOS ILUMA SMARTCORE INDUCTION
|
|
Correspondence Address: FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.
|
|
Applicant: Philip Morris Products S.A.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. PMPS 2010613
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Trademark Act Section 2(d) Search Results – No Conflicting Marks Found
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
However, the applicant must address the following substantive/procedural issues:
Summary of Issues
Amended Identification of Goods Required
The identification of goods must be clarified because many of the goods are indefinite and/or broad, and therefore, do not clearly and specifically indicate the nature of goods for which registration is sought. Therefore, applicant must amend the referenced wording below in accordance with the bolded guidance provided. Please note that, in some instances, examining attorney has replaced any unacceptable wording with acceptable wording.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: (bold indicates modified language)
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Disclaimer Statement Required
The attached dictionary definitions from Merriam-Webster defines INDUCTION as “the production of an electrical or magnetic effect through the influence of a nearby magnet, electrical current, or electrically charged body” and SYSTEM as “an organized or established procedure.” When used together, the combined wording INDUCTION SYSTEM refers to an organized or established procedure for producing an electrical or magnetic effect. Applicant’s various electronic smoking products may operate by using a specific procedure to create an electrical current, or to activate the electrical components of the goods. Therefore, the wording INDUCTION SYSTEM merely describes a feature or characteristic of the goods, namely, they operate via a specific procedure for activating the electrical components, or an INDUCTION SYSTEM.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “INDUCTION SYSTEM” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Section 44(d) Sole Filing Basis With No Intent to Perfect
Therefore, applicant must clarify the basis in the application by satisfying one of the following:
(1) If applicant intends to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration, and applicant’s statement in the application that he or she does not intend to rely on a Section 44(e) basis was inadvertently submitted, then applicant should so specify. In addition, (a) applicant’s country of origin must either be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law; and (b) applicant must submit a true copy, photocopy, certification or certified copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(b)-(c), (e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§1002.01, 1004, 1016. A copy of the foreign registration must be a copy of a document that issued to applicant by or was certified by the intellectual property office in applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1004.01. If the foreign registration is not written in English, then applicant must provide an English translation. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b). The translation should be signed by the translator. TMEP §1004.01(b). If the foreign registration is not yet available, applicant should respond to this Office action to indicate that the foreign application is still pending and request suspension of the U.S. application until a copy of the foreign registration is available. TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04(a).
(2) If applicant does not intend to rely on Section 44(e) as a basis for registration, applicant must establish a basis for registration under Section 1(a) or basis for publication under Section 1(b) by satisfying the relevant requirements. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(4)(iii); TMEP §1003.03; see 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)-(b); TMEP §806.01(a)-(b). Please note that applicant may retain the priority filing date under Section 44(d) without perfecting the Section 44(e) basis, if applicant’s U.S. application satisfied the requirements of Section 44(d) as of the U.S. application filing date and applicant has a continuing valid basis for registration. See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(3)-(4); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.03(h).
Response Guidelines
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Bechhofer, Yocheved
/Yocheved Bechhofer/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 114
571-272-9329
Yocheved.Bechhofer@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE