Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  February 11, 2021

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

 

Results of Trademark Act Section 2(d) Search

 

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

 

Summary of Issues that Applicant Must Address

 

1.     Requirement to Provide Bar Information/Documentation for Attorney of Record

2.     Requirement to Clarify the Actual Date the Application was Signed

3.     Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 Refusal - Specimens are Unacceptable

4.     Requirement for Additional Information/Documentation

 

 

Requirement to Provide Bar Information/Documentation for Attorney of Record

 

The application record indicates that applicant is represented by Jeffrey S. Firestone; however, the record is unclear about whether this individual is qualified to practice before the USPTO.  See 37 C.F.R. §11.14(a); TMEP §§602 et seq.  Specifically, the application indicates that this attorney is a member of the New York bar, but this attorney is not listed as an active member of the New York bar in the database of the New York State Unified Court System.  Please see the screen shot at Attachment 1 showing the results of a relevant search of this database.

 

Only attorneys who are active members in good standing of the bar of a highest court of a U.S. state (including the District of Columbia or any U.S. commonwealth or territory) may practice before the USPTO in trademark matters.  37 C.F.R. §§2.17(a), 11.14; TMEP §§602.01-.03.  Accordingly, applicant must provide documentation showing the attorney’s active bar membership in good standing in the designated bar, in the form of a certificate of good standing or a letter from the bar.  37 C.F.R. §§2.17(b)(3), 2.61(b). 

 

If the originally submitted attorney bar information is incorrect, applicant’s attorney must specify the correct bar information and provide supporting documentation showing the attorney’s active bar membership in good standing in the form of a certificate of good standing or a letter from the bar.  37 C.F.R. §§2.17(b)(3), 2.61(b).  Merely furnishing a bar membership card is insufficient and will not satisfy the requirement for supporting documentation.  Otherwise, applicant may appoint or designate a different attorney who is qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(a).

 

Failure to comply with this requirement is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.  Merely stating that the attorney’s bar information is available on a state bar’s website is an insufficient response and will not make the relevant information of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

To provide attorney bar credentials or to change bar information.  Open the correct TEAS response form and enter the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #3, and on the “Additional Statement(s)” page in the “Miscellaneous Statement” field (1) explain the documentation provided and (2) click the button below the text box to attach evidence.  To change attorney bar information, go to the “Attorney Information” page of the form and update the bar information section.  Bar information provided in any other area of the form will be viewable by the public in USPTO records.

 

 

Requirement to Clarify the Actual Date the Application was Signed

 

The application indicates it was signed on October 16, 2020, which is subsequent to the document’s filing date of October 15, 2020.  Because documents cannot be executed after filing, applicant must specify the actual date the document was signed.  TMEP §804.03; see 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b). 

 

For more information about the verified statement and instructions on providing a verified statement or date of signing using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, see the Verified statement webpage.

 

 

Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 Refusal – Specimens are Unacceptable

 

Registration is refused because the specimens appear to consist of either (1) digitally created or altered images or mockups of a depiction of the mark on the goods or their packaging or (2) a mockup of a depiction of the mark on a webpage.  Therefore, the specimens do not show the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce in International Class 3.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a), (c); TMEP §§904.04(a), 904.07(a). 

 

An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a).  “Use in commerce” means (1) a bona fide use of the applied-for mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is placed in any manner on the goods, packaging, tags or labels affixed to the goods, or displays that directly associate the mark with the goods and have a point-of-sale nature, and (3) the goods are actually sold or transported in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127.

 

Specimens Comprising Photographs of Product Packaging

 

An image of a product or packaging that has been digitally created or altered to include the mark or a mockup of how the mark may be displayed on the product or packaging is not a proper specimen for goods because it does not show actual use of the mark in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §904.04(a).

 

In this case, the specimens comprising photographs of product packaging for mascara appear to be digitally created because the mark appears to float over the packaging and because the pixelation around the mark is different than for the remainder of the photograph.  Therefore, the photograph specimens appear to have been digitally altered to add the mark to existing photographs, and they do not show actual use of the mark in commerce. 

 

Webpage Specimens

 

An electronic display or webpage that has been digitally created or altered to include the mark or a mockup of how the mark may be displayed on the electronic display or webpage is not a proper specimen for goods because it does not show actual use of the mark in commerce.  See 15 U.S.C. §1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §904.04(a).

 

In this case, it appears that applicant has created a mockup online listing for mascara because the listing utilizes product descriptions and trademarks of a third party.  In particular, the listing includes the third party trademarks “L’OREAL,” “VOLUMINOUS” and “BECAUSE YOU’RE WORTH IT.”  Please see the copies of Reg. No. 4945102 (“L’OREAL), Reg. No. 1695707 (VOLUMINOUS) and Reg. No. 2320106 (BECAUSE YOU’RE WORTH IT) at Attachment 2.  Please also see the screen shots from the L’OREAL® website at Attachment 3 for a mascara product that uses some of the same product descriptions reflected in applicant’s webpage specimen.  

 

Finally, the screen shot supplied by applicant ostensibly showing a fulfilled order from the webpage is not persuasive evidence that the mark is actually in use in commerce via the webpage because it indicates that the order was created, marked as paid, confirmed by email to the supposed buyer, fulfilled, and then archived simultaneously, which is highly unlikely.

 

Therefore, the webpage specimen appears to be a mockup that does not show actual use of the mark in commerce. 

 

Response options.  Applicant may respond to the specimen refusal by satisfying one of the following options for each applicable international class: 

 

(1)       Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the goods identified in the application.  A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application.”  The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.  For instructions on how to submit a different specimen using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.

 

(2)       Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), as no specimen is required before publication.  This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements, including a specimen.

 

If applicant submits an acceptable verified substitute specimen or amends to Section 1(b), the requirement below for additional information/documentation about the original specimen will be withdrawn.  The requirement below as to the original specimen will be made final if applicant submits a substitute specimen that is not acceptable or does not amend to Section 1(b), and does not also respond completely to the requirement below.

 

 

Requirement for Additional Information/Documentation

 

Additional information/documentation about original specimen(s) required.  To permit proper examination of the application record for compliance with use in commerce requirements, applicant must respond to the following requests for information and documentation about the specimen(s).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814.  A specimen must show the mark as actually used in commerce, which means use in the ordinary course of trade, and not merely to reserve a right in the trademark.  15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1052, 1127.  Because the specimen of record appears to be digitally created or altered, or is a mockup, further information is necessary to determine whether the specimen is in actual use in commerce. 

 

Answer for each specimen/photograph/image previously provided.  For any website source, provide a digital copy of the entire webpage from top to bottom, as rendered in an Internet browser, that includes the URL and access or print date.  TMEP §710.01(b) (citing In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1733 (TTAB 2018)).

 

Applicant Must Respond to the Following Requirement for Information/Documentation for the Specimens Comprising Photographs of Product Packaging

 

(1)       Identify the particular good(s) listed in the application for which the specimen(s) was submitted to show use of the mark.

 

(2)       Explain whether the specimen was created for submission with this application.  If so, specify the date each specimen was created.  If applicant used the image(s) of the goods shown in the specimen(s) from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.

 

(3)       Provide information about and examples of how applicant’s goods appear in the actual sales environment.

(a)       If sold in stores, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the stores and of photographs showing the goods for sale in the named stores, such as photographs of the sales displays or goods on shelves with the mark. 

(b)       If sold online, provide a representative sample of the name(s) of the online retailers, the website URL(s) for each named retailer, and a digital copy of the webpages showing the goods for sale on the named website.

(c)       If sold in another type of sales environment (e.g., catalogs, trade shows), identify the environment and provide photographs and/or documentation showing the goods for sale in that environment. 

 

(4)       If the information in question (3) about how the goods appear in the actual sales environment is not available to applicant, please describe how applicant’s goods are sold or transported and provide photographs and other documentation showing how applicant’s mark appears on the goods and/or its packaging when the goods are sold or transported to or within the United States.

 

(5)       For each category of sales environment specified in response to questions (3) and (4), specify when the goods bearing the mark were first available for purchase within the United States, the date of the first sale of the goods to or within the United States, and whether the goods are still for sale to or within the United States in that environment.

 

(6)       For the goods identified in response to question (1), provide documentation that shows payment or other consideration made for the goods, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.

 

Applicant Must Respond to the Following Requirement for Information/Documentation for the Specimens Comprising Website/Webpage Screen Shots

 

(1)       Identify the particular good(s) listed in the application for which the specimen(s) was submitted to show use of the mark.

 

(2)       Explain whether the specimen was created for submission with this application.  If so, specify the date each specimen was created.  If applicant obtained the content of the webpage or image(s) of the goods shown in the specimen(s) from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.

 

(3)       For each web-based specimen submission, provide the full name of the online retailer or wholesaler whose webpage is shown in the specimen, the website URL, the access or print date, and a digital copy of the complete webpage showing the goods for sale on the named website.

 

(4)       For each online retailer or wholesaler identified in response to question (3), specify the date the goods bearing the mark were first available for purchase within the United States, the date of the first sale of the goods to or within the United States through that retailer/wholesaler, and whether the goods are still for sale to or within the United States through that retailer/wholesaler.  If applicant is the online retailer or wholesaler, provide at least three invoices or other supporting documentation that show payments or other consideration made and state the dollar amount of sales with or within the United States, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.

 

(5)       If the goods identified in response to question (1) are sold in another type of sales environment, identify the environment (e.g. retail stores, catalogs, trade shows) and provide photographs and/or documentation showing the goods for sale with the mark in that environment, such as photographs of the sales displays or goods on shelves.  If the information about how the goods appear in the actual sales environment is not available to applicant, describe how applicant’s goods are sold or transported to or within the United States and provide photographs and other documentation showing how applicant’s mark appears on the goods and/or its packaging when the goods are sold or transported to or within the United States.

 

Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish information is grounds for refusing registration.  In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.  Merely stating that information is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional information or materials of record.  See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).

 

 

Response Information

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

If applicant has any questions about this Office action, please contact the undersigned examining attorney.

 

/Linda Lavache/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 106

p. 571.272.7187

linda.lavache@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon. 

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on February 11, 2021 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90258442

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Linda Lavache/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 106

p. 571.272.7187

linda.lavache@uspto.gov

 

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from February 11, 2021, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”