To: | Yiju (Shenzhen) Network Technology Co., ETC. (hni@nilawfirm.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90258287 - LEIGEI - 993140 |
Sent: | March 24, 2021 10:47:57 AM |
Sent As: | ecom113@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90258287
Mark: LEIGEI
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Yiju (Shenzhen) Network Technology Co., ETC.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 993140
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
PRIORITY ACTION
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 24, 2021
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Applicant must address issues shown below. On March 21, 2021, the examining attorney and Hao Ni, attorney for applicant, discussed the issue below. Applicant must timely respond to this issue. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.
REPRESENTATIVE SPECIMENS REQUIRED – PARTIAL REQUIREMENT
The application identifies a wide variety and range of unrelated goods. In particular, the goods range from bread baking machines to cosmetic refrigerators to USB powered humidifiers for household use, all of which are disparate items used for different purposes and would not be regarded as related by customers. Therefore, applicant must submit additional specimens to allow for a complete and accurate examination of the application and assessment of the registrability of the subject mark, in accordance with Rule 2.61(b). 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); see TMEP §904.01(a).
Applicant has submitted adequate specimen for the following groups of goods with its application: “Electric heating fans”.
Applicant should submit specimens demonstrating use of the mark for each all of the following groups of goods:
If applicant is unable to provide specimens to support use of these items, applicant must delete these entries, or amend the filing basis for those goods that were not in proper use as of the application filing date to an intent to use basis under Section 1(b). This option will later necessitate additional fees and filing requirements such as providing a specimen for these goods at a subsequent date.
Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish additional specimens is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Merely stating that evidence is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional specimens of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES AND PARTIAL ABANDONMENT ADVISORY
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address the requirement in this Office action by setting forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
In such case, the application will then proceed with the following goods only: “Electric heating fans”. See TMEP §718.02(a).
If the applicant has any questions or needs further assistance, please telephone the assigned examining attorney.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Elena Kravtsoff/
Elena Kravtsoff
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 113, USPTO
(571) 272-3233
elena.kravtsoff@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE