Offc Action Outgoing

ESSENZ

LivaNova USA, INC.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90227474 - ESSENZ - 18357.134US1

To: LivaNova USA, INC. (dockmpls@merchantgould.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90227474 - ESSENZ - 18357.134US1
Sent: March 05, 2021 08:20:18 PM
Sent As: ecom124@uspto.gov
Attachments: Attachment - 1

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 90227474

 

Mark:  ESSENZ

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

DANIELLE I. MATTESSICH

MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.

P.O. BOX 2910

MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910

 

 

 

Applicant:  LivaNova USA, INC.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 18357.134US1

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 dockmpls@merchantgould.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  March 05, 2021

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

  • Identification of Goods
  • Translation Statement Required

 

 

Search Results

 

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

 

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS

 

The identification of goods must be amended because the wording is indefinite and too broad.

 

The wording “Medical apparatus and instruments” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because the purpose of the goods is unclear.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:  “Medical apparatus and instruments for treating cardiovascular disease.”

 

The wording “heart and lung machines” in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because type or purpose of the machines is unclear.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:  “heart pacemakers; lung machines, namely, lung ventilators with monitoring capability.”

 

The identification for “perfusion systems; perfusion data management systems” in International Class 10 is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the nature of the specific systems and could identify goods in more than one international class.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1401.05(d).  For example, “lawn-care systems comprised of herbicides, pesticides, and lawn sprinklers” are in International Class 5, and “lawn-care systems comprised of lawn mowers and herbicides” are in International Class 7.

 

Applicant must clarify the goods by (1) describing the nature, purpose, or use of the system; and (2) listing the system’s parts or components, using common generic terms and referencing the primary parts or components of the system first.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.01, 1402.03(a).  Additionally, this wording should be classified in the same international class as the primary parts or components of the system.  See TMEP §1401.05(d). 

 

The identification for “accessories” and “spare parts” in International Class 10 must be clarified because it is indefinite and does not make clear what the goods are.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. 

 

However, while the word “accessories” and “spare parts” alone is generally unacceptable for the reasons identified above, the wording “replacement parts therefor” or “structural parts therefor” is acceptable when it follows a definite identification of goods.  See TMEP §1402.03(a).

 

To address the indefinite wording discussed above, applicant may adopt any or all of the following identification of goods, if accurate.  Suggested changes are indicated in bold, strikethrough, and underlined fonts. 

 

International Class 10:            Medical apparatus and instruments for treating cardiovascular disease and their accessories {specify common commercial names of accessories}; heart pacemakers and lung machines, namely, lung ventilators with monitoring capability; perfusion systems comprised of {list generic names of system components with Class 10 primary components first}; perfusion data management systems comprised of {list generic names of system components with Class 10 primary components first};, accessories and spare parts for the aforementioned articles {specify generic names of accessories and spare parts in Class 10}.

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

 

 

Translation Statement Required

 

To permit proper examination of the application, applicant must submit an English translation of all wording in the mark because it is foreign wording.  37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(9), 2.61(b); TMEP §809.  The following English translation is suggested:  The English translation of “ESSENZ” is “essence”.  TMEP §809.03.  See attached translation evidence.

 

 

 

Responding to this Office action

 

Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/April Reeves/

April E. Reeves

Examining Attorney

Law Office 124

(571) 272-3681

april.reeves@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

Offc Action Outgoing [image/jpeg]

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90227474 - ESSENZ - 18357.134US1

To: LivaNova USA, INC. (dockmpls@merchantgould.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90227474 - ESSENZ - 18357.134US1
Sent: March 05, 2021 08:20:19 PM
Sent As: ecom124@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on March 05, 2021 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90227474

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/April Reeves/

April E. Reeves

Examining Attorney

Law Office 124

(571) 272-3681

april.reeves@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from March 05, 2021, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed