To: | FENGSHUN LLC (fengshun085@gmail.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90216943 - TAYLEDO - N/A |
Sent: | February 24, 2021 10:38:42 AM |
Sent As: | ecom125@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90216943
Mark: TAYLEDO
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: FENGSHUN LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
ISSUE DATE: February 24, 2021
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
ADDRESS OF RECORD UNACCEPTABLE – APPLICANT’S DOMICILE ADDRESS REQUIRED
Applicant must provide an updated domicile address because the address of record is unacceptable. All applications must include the applicant’s domicile address, and domicile dictates whether an applicant is required to have an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory represent the applicant at the USPTO. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.11(a), 2.189; Requirement of U.S.-Licensed Attorney for Foreign-Domiciled Trademark Applicants & Registrants, Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. (Rev. Sept. 2019).
An individual applicant’s domicile is the place a person resides and intends to be the person’s principal home. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. A juristic entity’s domicile is the principal place of business, i.e. headquarters, where a juristic entity applicant’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities. 37 C.F.R. §2.2(o); Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A. An applicant whose domicile is located outside of the United States or its territories is foreign-domiciled and must be represented at the USPTO by a U.S.-licensed attorney qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a).
The application lists applicant as a juristic entity and specifies applicant’s domicile as 18351 Colima Road Ste 2896 Rowland Heights CALIFORNIA 91748, a commercial mail receiving agency, instead of a street address. See attached website screenshots showing the address of record is a commercial mail receiving agency. Commercial mail receiving agencies are private businesses that accept mail from the Postal Service on behalf of third parties. This address is unacceptable as a domicile address because it does not identify the location of applicant’s headquarters where the entity’s senior executives or officers ordinarily direct and control the entity’s activities. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.189; Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3. Thus, applicant must provide its domicile street address. See 37 C.F.R. §2.189. Alternatively, an applicant may demonstrate that the listed address is, in fact, the applicant’s domicile. Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3.
Advisory – How To Provide Documentation Supporting Applicant’s Domicile
Open the correct TEAS response form and enter the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #3, and on the “Additional Statement(s)” page, below the “Miscellaneous Statement” field, click the button below the text box to attach documentation to support the address.
Advisory – How To Provide Applicant’s Domicile Street Address
After opening the correct TEAS response form and entering the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #5, and provide applicant’s street address on the “Owner Information” page. Information provided in the TEAS response form will be publicly viewable.
If applicant wants to hide its domicile address from public view because of privacy or other concerns, applicant must have a mailing address that can be made public and differs from its domicile address. In this case, applicant must follow the steps below in the correct order to ensure the domicile address will be hidden:
1. First submit a TEAS Change Address or Representation (CAR) form. Open the form, enter the serial number, click “Continue,” and
a. Use the radio buttons to select “Owner” for the role of the person submitting the form;
b. Answer “Yes” to the wizard question asking, “Do you want to UPDATE the mailing address, email address, phone or fax number(s) for the trademark owner/holder?” and click “Continue;”
c. On the “Owner Information” page, if the previously provided mailing address has changed, applicant must enter its new mailing address in the “Mailing Address” field, which will be publicly viewable;
d. On the “Owner Information” page, uncheck the box next to “Domicile Address” and enter the new domicile address in the text box immediately below the checkbox.
2. Then submit a TEAS response form to indicate the domicile address has been changed. Open the form and
a. Answer “yes” to wizard question #3 and click “Continue;”
b. Click on the “Miscellaneous Statement” box on the “Additional Statement(s)” page, and enter a statement in the text box immediately below the checkbox that the domicile address was previously changed in the CAR form.
Advisory – Foreign-Domiciled Applicants Must Appoint a U.S.-Licensed Attorney
If applicant amends the application to list a domicile street address located outside of the United States or its territories, applicant is foreign-domiciled and must appoint a U.S. licensed attorney qualified to practice before the USPTO under 37 C.F.R. §11.14 as its representative before the application may proceed to registration. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information. If applicant’s domicile street address is located within the United States or its territories, applicant is not required to appoint a U.S.-licensed attorney.
To appoint an attorney, applicant should submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Change Address or Representation form. The newly-appointed attorney must submit a TEAS Response to Examining Attorney Office Action form indicating that an appointment of attorney has been made and address all other refusals or requirements in this action, if any. Alternatively, if applicant retains an attorney before filing the response, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).
Moreover, applicant must respond to the requirements below.
STATE OF ORGANIZATION UNCLEAR – CLARIFICATION OF ENTITY’S STATE OF ORGANIZATION REQUIRED
An application for registration must specify the state or nation under whose laws the applicant is organized. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3); TMEP § 803.04. A domestic applicant must specify the U.S. state under whose laws a limited liability company is organized. TMEP §803.03(h); see 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(3)(ii), 2.61(b). Applicant has stated that it is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the state of California. However, the attached search results from the web page for the Secretary of State of California indicates that Fengshun LLC does not appear to be an existing limited liability company in California. See California Secretary of State website evidence (showing only one “Fengshun” search result for a different entity that is no longer a registered LLC). Applicant must clarify this discrepancy or specify its actual state of organization. 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§803.03(h), 803.04.
If the application was filed by the owner and there is an inadvertent error in the applicant’s name, such as a minor typographical error or misspelling, or the name identifies a party that did not exist as of the application filing date, the application may be amended to correct the applicant’s name. TMEP §1201.02(c). In either case, applicant should include in the amendment request the reason for the correction (such as “ABC LLC did not exist as of the filing date of the application,” or “Company” was inadvertently omitted from the applicant’s name in the application). Id.
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration will be refused under Trademark Act Section 1 because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines of the trademark application process, applicant is encouraged to hire a private attorney who specializes in trademark matters to assist in this process. The assigned trademark examining attorney can provide only limited assistance explaining the content of an Office action and the application process. USPTO staff cannot provide legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights. TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Cristel John/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 125
(571) 272-5412
cristel.john@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE