To: | Palm Beach Tan, Inc. (cberryman@winstead.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90097980 - AMETHYST PREMIER COLLECTION - 47226-K077US |
Sent: | December 08, 2020 12:03:12 PM |
Sent As: | ecom106@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90097980
Mark: AMETHYST PREMIER COLLECTION
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Palm Beach Tan, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 47226-K077US
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 08, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02. However, a mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.
The filing date of pending U.S. Application Serial No. 90012561 precedes applicant’s filing date. See attached referenced application. If the mark in the referenced application registers, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion between the two marks. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. Therefore, upon receipt of applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced application.
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIREMENT TO AVOID DECEPTIVENESS
Applicant’s mark includes the wording “AMETHYST”, which indicates that applicant’s goods have and/or exhibit, (or will have and/or will exhibit) the following feature or characteristic: containing amethyst.
Amethyst has always been well-known for its relaxing properties. Used in cosmetic products, its powder can help to obtain firmer connective tissue and can make the skin more resistant to environmental influences. Skin care products containing amethyst powder can very often create more beautiful, pure skin, an improved skin colour and a relaxed facial expression. See attached information from http://www.raucosmetics.de/shop/en/amethyst-powder. Moreover, when applied to skincare, amethyst can help cleanse the skin of toxins, excess oils and daily debris such as dead skin cells. The stone also works to promote the flow of oxygen to the skin. See attached information from http://www.kristals.com/pages/amethyst.
This feature or characteristic is considered desirable for applicant’s goods because amethyst, is considered desirable for applicant’s goods because of the numerous health benefits it provides particularly for the skin as noted above. However, if some or all of the goods do not (or will not) in fact have or exhibit this feature or characteristic, then registration may be refused because the mark consists of or includes deceptive matter in relation to the identified goods. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(a); In re Budge Mfg. Co., 857 F.2d 773, 8 USPQ2d 1259 (Fed. Cir. 1988); TMEP §1203.02-.02(b).
To avoid such refusal, applicant may amend the identification to specify that the goods and/or services possess this relevant feature or characteristic. See TMEP §§1203.02(e)(ii), (f)(i), 1402.05 et seq. However, merely amending the identification to exclude goods or services with the named feature or characteristic will not avoid a deceptiveness refusal. TMEP §1203.02(f)(i).
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate (suggestions in bold and deleted wording strikethrough):
International Class 3: Tanning creams, lotions and gels; tanning skin creams, tanning lotions and tanning gels for accelerating, enhancing, intensifying and extending tans; after tanning gels; body and facial bronzers; all the foregoing containing amethyst.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
DISCLAIMER REQUIREMENT
Applicant must disclaim the wording “AMETHYST PREMIER COLLECTION” because it is merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
The attached evidence from Merriam-Webster defines “AMETHYST” as “clear purple or bluish-violet variety of crystallized quartz that is often used as a jeweler's stone.” Furthermore, the attached evidence also shows that the wording may be used to describe or indicate the color or shade of the goods. See http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/amethyst; http://www.well-belle.com/products/amethyst-crystal-gemstone-palette; http://viseartparis.com/products/theory-highlighter-and-bronzer-01-blusher-bronzer-enamored; http://solaire.com.au/amethyst-2-hr-dark-fast-colourfuze-complex-violet-vbs-18-dha-1l/. Thus, this wording merely describes a feature or characteristic of applicant’s goods in that the goods may contain AMETHYST for the reasons stated above or it may describe the color of the goods.
In addition, “self-laudatory or puffing marks are regarded as a condensed form of describing the character or quality of the goods [or services].” DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d at 1256, 103 USPQ2d at 1759 (quoting In re The Boston Beer Co., 198 F.3d 1370, 1373, 53 USPQ2d 1056, 1058 (Fed. Cir. 1999)). Thus, wording such as “ultimate,” “best,” “greatest,” and the like are generally considered laudatory and descriptive of an alleged superior quality of the goods and/or services. See In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 1342, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. Cir. 2001); In re The Boston Beer Co., 198 F.3d at 1373-74, 53 USPQ2d at 1058-59; TMEP §1209.03(k).
The attached evidence from Merriam-Webster shows that the word “COLLECT,” the verb form for the word “COLLECTION” means “to bring together into one body or place,” and that the word “PREMIER” means “first in position, rank, or importance.” Therefore, this wording is merely laudatory of the supposed superior quality of the goods which are aggregated into a group of items available for purchase.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “AMETHYST PREMIER COLLECTION” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT
The following description is suggested, if accurate: The mark consists of the word "AMETHYST" in stylized lettering written vertically above a palm tree design with the right side of the trunk circling above the palm tree to the left of the words "PREMIER COLLECTION".
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Marcya N. Betts/
/Marcya N. Betts/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 106
(571) 272-4913
Marcya.Betts@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE