Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

FINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  March 25, 2021

 

 

This Final Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 12/21/2020 in which applicant addressed the following issues:

 

1.      Requirement for an Acceptable Identification of Services

2.      Requirement for a Disclaimer

 

The trademark examining attorney issued an Office action on November 19, 2020, which identified certain refusals and/or requirements regarding the application.  On December 21, 2020, the USPTO received applicant’s response; however, the response contained no text or data but was merely a blank submission bearing applicant’s signature.  In other words, the response did not address any of the refusals and/or requirements in the Office action.

 

A response whose entire contents comprise an applicant’s signature is not sufficient to show an applicant’s agreement with the issues raised in an Office action.  To be considered a complete response, such response must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement raised and be properly signed.  TMEP §§715.03(a)(ii)(E), 718.03; see 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(b), 2.65(a).

 

Therefore, because applicant submitted a blank response, all the previously raised refusals and/or requirements are now made FINAL.  37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.03. 

 

E-MAIL ENCOURAGED TO RESOLVE ALL ISSUES

 

Please email the assigned trademark examining attorney at Tasneem.hussain@uspto.gov to resolve the issues in this Office Action. 

 

IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF SERVICES

 

The identification of services is indefinite and must be clarified because the wording is grammatically incorrect.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01.  This is a TEAS Plus application and applicant chose the following fill-in identification of services:

 

Organizing chapters of a {indicate specific group, e.g., motorcycle, sky diving, book reading, etc.} club and promoting the interests of the members thereof     

 

However, applicant inserted wording that goes beyond merely specifying the group and is confusing. Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate: 

 

 

 

“Organizing chapters of a motorcycle riding club that helps the community with fundraisers and riding events for members who ride motorcycles as a hobby and promoting the interests of the members thereof” in International Class 035

 

SCOPE ADVISORY: Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the services, but not to broaden or expand the services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

DESCRIPTION ADVISORY: Identifications of services are examined in accordance with the Trademark Rules of Practice and the USPTO’s policies and procedures in effect on the date an application is filed (although an applicant may voluntarily choose to follow policies and procedures adopted after the application was filed).  See 37 C.F.R. §2.85(e)(1)-(e)(2); TMEP §§1401.09, 1402.14.  For guidance on drafting acceptable identifications of services, use the USPTO’s online U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual (ID Manual), which is continually updated in accordance with prevailing rules and policies.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

This issue is now made final.

 

DISCLAIMER REQUIRED

 

Applicant must disclaim the wording “RIDING CLUB” because it is merely descriptive of a feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s riding club services.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a). 

 

The previously attached evidence from American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language shows RIDING means “The act or an instance of riding, as in a vehicle” while CLUB means “A group of people organized for a common purpose”.  The wording appears in the identification of services itself.  Thus, the wording merely describes applicant’s services as involving a club for motorcycle riders.

 

A “disclaimer” is a statement in the application record that an applicant does not claim exclusive rights to an unregistrable component of the mark.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d 978, 979-80, 144 USPQ 433, 433 (C.C.P.A. 1965); TMEP §1213.  A disclaimer does not physically remove the disclaimed matter from the mark or otherwise affect the appearance of the mark.  See Schwarzkopf v. John H. Breck, Inc., 340 F.2d at 979, 144 USPQ2d at 433; TMEP §1213.

 

In other words, applicant’s mark will remain “SANCTIFIED SOULS RIDING CLUB” with the statement in the Office records that applicant does not claim to have sole rights in the descriptive wording. If applicant does not provide the required disclaimer, the USPTO may refuse to register the entire mark.  See In re Stereotaxis Inc., 429 F.3d 1039, 1041, 77 USPQ2d 1087, 1089 (Fed. Cir. 2005); TMEP §1213.01(b).

 

Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format: 

 

No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “RIDING CLUB” apart from the mark as shown. 

 

For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage. 

 

This issue is now made final.

 

Proper Response to Final Office Action – Full Refusal(s)/Requirement(s)

 

Applicant must respond within six months of the date of issuance of this final Office action or the application will be abandoned.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).  Applicant may respond by providing one or both of the following:

 

(1)        A request for reconsideration that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals; and/or

 

(2)        An appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board with the required filing fees.

 

TMEP §715.01; see 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b)(1)-(2).

 

Please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines of the trademark application process, applicant is encouraged to hire a private attorney who specializes in trademark matters to assist in this process.  The assigned trademark examining attorney can provide only limited assistance explaining the content of an Office action and the application process.  USPTO staff cannot provide legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights.  TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information. 

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a request for reconsideration of this final Office action that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals and/or click to file a timely appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with the required filing fee(s).

 

 

/Ms. Tasneem Hussain/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 118

tasneem.hussain@uspto.gov (preferred)

571.272.8273

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on March 25, 2021 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90086970

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Ms. Tasneem Hussain/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 118

tasneem.hussain@uspto.gov (preferred)

571.272.8273

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from March 25, 2021, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”