Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  November 16, 2020

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

• Specimen Requirement
• Mark Description Requirement

 

SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

However, applicant must respond to the following requirements.

 

SPECIMEN REQUIREMENT

 

Specimen does not show use in specific class.  Registration is refused because the specimen does not show the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce in connection with any of the goods and/or services specified in International Class 35.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); In re Keep A Breast Found., 123 USPQ2d 1869, 1876-79 (TTAB 2017); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a), 1301.04(d), (g)(i).  An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce for each international class of services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a); see In re Gulf Coast Nutritionals, Inc., 106 USPQ2d 1243, 1247 (TTAB 2013). 

 

Specifically, the specimen shows the mark against a color background with additional wording in what appears to be an advertisement.  However, the specimen does not show what services if any are being advertised.  Thus, the specimen does not show use of the mark in connection with retail store services featuring clothing, accessories, or household items.

 

Examples of specimens.  Specimens for services must show a direct association between the mark and the services and include:  (1) copies of advertising and marketing material, (2) a photograph of business signage or billboards, or (3) materials showing the mark in the sale, rendering, or advertising of the services.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(2), (c); TMEP §1301.04(a), (h)(iv)(C). 

 

Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed on the specimen itself, within the TEAS form that submits the specimen, or in a verified statement under 37 C.F.R. §2.20 or 28 U.S.C. §1746 in a later-filed response.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.03(i), 1301.04(a).

 

Response options.  Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:

 

(1)        Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the services identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.”  The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.

 

(2)        Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) (which includes withdrawing an amendment to allege use, if one was filed), as no specimen is required before publication.  This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements, including a specimen.

 

For an overview of the response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy these options using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage. 

 

MARK DESCRIPTION REQUIREMENT

 

Applicant must submit an amended description of the mark because the current one uses broad, vague language that does not accurately describe the mark.  37 C.F.R. §2.37; see TMEP §§808.01, 808.02.  Descriptions must be accurate and identify all the literal and design elements in the mark.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §808.02.  In this case, the description is vague because it is not clear which parts of the mark are white and which are transparent, and the nature and positioning of the wording and beard is unclear.  In addition, the color of the wording is omitted.

 

Further, applicant must submit an amended description deleting the term “Lemon Tuesday” because it may be proprietary mark that does not appear to be owned by applicant.  TMEP §808.02.  Descriptions must use common non-proprietary language to describe the mark elements.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §808.02; cf. Camloc Fastener Corp. v. Grant, 119 USPQ 264, 265 n.1 (TTAB 1958) (the use of registered marks in identifications is inappropriate because it indicates origin in another party); TMEP §1402.09.

 

If the mark is against a transparent background, the following description is suggested, if accurate: 

“The mark consists of a gold crown on the left with black eyebrows, female eyes in brown, black, and gold with brown irises, stylized wording “KYNGDOM AND QWYNDOM” in black, with the word “KYNGDOM” and the "A" of the word “AND” written on and near a white line on the gold crown. Gold crown overlaps black crown. The "ND" of the word "AND" is located at the end of gold crown below the black crown in the negative space above the black nose lining. The word “QWYNDOM” is below the black crown on the right and is written above the start of the black nose line. Below the black crown and nose line are lips in black outline within negative space in a black beard. Arches in the black crown are formed by negative space, and negative space forming a line runs from left to right near the bottom of black crown partially hidden where gold crown overlaps.  The remaining white in the mark is background and/or transparent area only and is not claimed as a feature of the mark.”

 

If only the face of the man is in white, the following description is suggested, if accurate:

“The mark consists of a gold crown on the left with black eyebrows, female eyes in brown, black, and gold with brown irises, stylized wording “KYNGDOM AND QWYNDOM” in black, with the word “KYNGDOM” and the "A" of the word “AND” written on and near a white line on the gold crown. Gold crown overlaps black crown. The "ND" of the word "AND" is located at the end of gold crown below the black crown in the negative space above the black nose lining. The word “QWYNDOM” is below the black crown on the right and is written above the start of the black nose line. Below the black crown and nose line are lips in white with black outline in a black beard. Arches in the black crown are formed by negative space, and negative space forming a line runs from left to right near the bottom of black crown partially hidden where gold crown overlaps.  The area between the black crown and black beard that forms the shape of a face is white.  The remaining white in the mark is background and/or transparent area only and is not claimed as a feature of the mark.”

 

Applicant should also be advised that the mark in the drawing must match the mark in the specimen.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.51(a)-(b); TMEP §807.12(a).  For example, if the mark in the drawing features a white area between the black crown and beard, that area must also be white on the specimen. 

 

Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Christopher J Nodes/

Christopher J Nodes

Examining Attorney

Law Office 116

(571) 272-5220

christopher.nodes@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on November 16, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90079341

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Christopher J Nodes/

Christopher J Nodes

Examining Attorney

Law Office 116

(571) 272-5220

christopher.nodes@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from November 16, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”