To: | GRIFOLS DIAGNOSTIC SOLUTIONS INC. (aib@pattishall.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90059428 - BRAVO - 02274-316 |
Sent: | March 12, 2021 01:25:04 PM |
Sent As: | ecom123@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90059428
Mark: BRAVO
|
|
Correspondence Address: PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD |
|
Applicant: GRIFOLS DIAGNOSTIC SOLUTIONS INC.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 02274-316
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: March 12, 2021
Applicant submitted a foreign registration certificate and requested that the application be removed from suspension. However, applicant was also advised of the pending application below, which has an earlier filing date or effective filing date than applicant’s application. If the mark in the application below registers, the USPTO may refuse registration of applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered mark(s). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §1208.02(c). Information relevant to the application was sent previously.
- U.S. Application Serial No(s). 88938692
Applicant has elected not to address the potential likelihood of confusion with the prior-filed application. Consequently, action on this application is SUSPENDED until the prior-filed application below either registers or abandons. 37 C.F.R. §2.83(c); TMEP §§716 et seq.
NEW ISSUE: COUNTRY OF ORIGIN
Additionally, applicant’s response raises a new issue that must be addressed on removal of the application from suspension. Specifically, registration will be refused under Trademark Act Section 44(e) because the foreign registration is not from applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01. Specifically, applicant has submitted a foreign registration from the European Union to support applicant’s Section 44(e) basis; however, the application shows that applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in California.
To obtain registration under Section 44(e), an applicant must be the owner of a valid registration from the applicant’s country of origin. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1002.01. Under Section 44(c), “country of origin” is defined as the country in which an applicant (1) is domiciled, (2) has a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment, or (3) is a national. 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Because applicant is domiciled, incorporated, or organized in a country different from the country that issued the foreign registration, applicant must establish that, as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration, the country that issued the foreign registration is also applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.
Thus, to overcome this refusal, applicant may provide the following written statement for the record: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the European Union as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.” TMEP §1002.04. If applicant cannot assert that such country is a country of origin, applicant may delete the Section 44(e) basis and rely solely on Section 1(b)>as a basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b); TMEP §806.04.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
· /John LaMont/
· Examining Attorney
· Law Office 123
· (571) 270-0404
· john.lamont@uspto.gov