To: | Ningbo Mizhihe Import & Export Co., Ltd. (di@dililaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90040634 - LOVE UNICORN - US008640T |
Sent: | December 17, 2020 10:45:38 AM |
Sent As: | ecom125@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90040634
Mark: LOVE UNICORN
|
|
Correspondence Address: 17700 CASTLETON STREET, STE 353
|
|
Applicant: Ningbo Mizhihe Import & Export Co., Ltd.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. US008640T
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
ISSUE DATE: December 17, 2020
INTRODUCTION: This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on August 12, 2020 in connection with this application. Based on information and/or documentation in applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney now issues the following new: representative specimens required – response required and mark significance inquiry. See TMEP §§706, 711.02. Based on applicant’s response, the trademark examining attorney notes that the following requirements have been satisfied: mark description, color claim amended, request for information. See TMEP §§713.02, 714.04.
Maintained and Continued: Specimen Refusal. Specimen illegible - registration is refused because the specimen in International Class 14 is illegible and does not show the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce.
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02. If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
REPRESENTATIVE SPECIMENS REQUIRED
Applicant has applied for a multitude of goods in International Class 14. If an identification is so broad that it encompasses a wide range of products, the applicant must submit evidence that it actually uses the mark on a wide range of products to obtain registration. See In re Air Products & Chemicals, Inc., 192 USPQ 84, recon. denied 192 USPQ 157 (TTAB 1976); 37 CFR 2.61(b); TMEP §§904.01(a) and 1402.03.
Applicant must submit a proper specimen for each of the following groups of goods:
These specimens must be supported by a declaration.
Please note that applicant should delete all identifications of goods pertaining to goods that are not yet in use in commerce.
If applicant cannot submit proper specimens for the goods subject to this requirement, applicant may amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b), for which no specimen is required. This option will later necessitate additional fees and filing requirements such as providing a specimen. For an overview of this response option and instructions on how to satisfy this option online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/specimen.jsp.
STATEMENT REQUIRED – SIGNIFICANCE OF WORDING IN THE MARK
(1) Fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, advertisements and pertinent screenshots of applicant’s website as it relates to the goods and/or services in the application,
including any materials using the terms in the applied-for mark. Merely stating that information about the goods and/or services is available on applicant’s website is insufficient to make the information of record.;
(2) Explain how the Applicant is using the mark on “bracelets, earrings, gems, jewelry, jewellery charms, jewelry chains.”
(3) Provide examples of the mark being used in connection with Applicant’s goods for “bracelets, earrings, gems, jewelry, jewellery charms, jewelry chains.”
Factual information about the goods must clearly indicate how they operate, their salient features, and their prospective customers and channels of trade. Conclusory statements will not satisfy this requirement for information.
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re AOP LLC, 107 USPQ2d at 1651 (citing In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., 85 USPQ2d at 1919; In re DTI P’ship LLP, 67 USPQ2d 1699, 1701 (TTAB 2003); TMEP §814). Merely stating that information about the goods is available on applicant’s website is an insufficient response and will not make the relevant information of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Cristel John/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 125
(571) 272-5412
cristel.john@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE