Offc Action Outgoing

Trademark

GOOGLE LLC

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90026344 - GT-1574-US-1

To: GOOGLE LLC (tmdocket@google.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90026344 - GT-1574-US-1
Sent: September 30, 2020 06:18:29 PM
Sent As: ecom116@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 90026344

 

Mark:  

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

SCOTT CERESIA

1600 AMPHITHEATRE PARKWAY

MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94043

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  GOOGLE LLC

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. GT-1574-US-1

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 tmdocket@google.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  September 30, 2020

 

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

  • Identification of goods and services.
  • Amended mark description.

 

NO LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION

 

The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS AND SERVICES

 

Applicant must amend the identification of goods and services to provide an acceptable identification.

 

The following wording is acceptable as written:

 

“Downloadable software for modifying the appearance, enabling transmission, sharing, enhancing, indexing, storing, and creation of images, audio-visual and video content” in International Class 9.

 

Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, videos and digital messaging via global computer and communication networks; peer-to-peer sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of digital photo and video files among internet users” in International Class 38.

 

“Providing on-line non-downloadable software that gives users the ability to upload, download, edit, and share photos and videos; computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to manage their online photos and videos” in International Class 42.

 

The remaining wording in the identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified because it does not clearly and adequately describe the exact goods intended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01. 

 

The identification for software in International Class 9 is indefinite and too broad and must be clarified because the wording does not make clear the (1) nature or (2) format of the software and could identify goods and/or services in three international classes – as a product in International Class 9 or a service in International Class 41 or 42.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.03(d), 1402.11(a).  Specifically, applicant must indicate the purpose or function of the software, and if content- or field-specific, the content or field of use of the software.  TMEP §1402.03(d).  Additionally, applicant must indicate whether the software’s format is downloadable, recorded, or online non-downloadable.  See id.  Downloadable and recorded goods are in International Class 9, whereas providing their temporary, online non-downloadable use is a service in International Class 42; except for non-downloadable game software provided online or for temporary use, which is classified in International Class 41.  See TMEP §§1402.03(d), 1402.11(a)(xii).

 

The USPTO requires such specificity in order for a trademark examining attorney to examine the application properly and make appropriate decisions concerning possible conflicts between the applicant’s mark and other marks.  See In re N.A.D. Inc., 57 USPQ2d 1872, 1874 (TTAB 2000); TMEP §1402.03(d). 

 

The following are examples of acceptable identifications in International Class 9:  “recorded desktop publishing software” and “downloadable mobile applications for managing bank accounts.”  Additionally, the following are acceptable identifications in International Class 41:  “providing online non-downloadable game software” and “providing temporary use of non-downloadable game software.”  Finally, the following are acceptable identifications in International Class 42:  “providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software development tools” and “providing temporary use of non-downloadable cloud-based software for calculating energy costs.”

 

Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate: 

 

“Downloadable software for modifying the appearance, enabling transmission, sharing, enhancing, indexing, storing, and creation of images, audio-visual and video content; {specify downloadable or recorded} computer software for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage and sharing of data and information” in International Class 9.

 

Telecommunications services, namely, electronic transmission of data, images, videos and digital messaging via global computer and communication networks; peer-to-peer sharing services, namely, electronic transmission of digital photo and video files among internet users” in International Class 38.

 

“Providing on-line non-downloadable software that gives users the ability to upload, download, edit, and share photos and videos; computer services, namely, providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to manage their online photos and videos” in International Class 42.

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

AMENDED COLOR CLAIM/DESCRIPTION

 

Applicant has provided the following color claim/description:

 

The color(s) red, yellow, green and blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. 

 

The mark consists of a multi-colored pinwheel design.

 

That claim is unacceptable, however, because it does not indicate where the claimed colors appear in the mark.

 

The examiner therefore recommends the following color claim/description, which applicant may adopt, if accurate:

 

The color(s) red, yellow, green and blue is/are claimed as a feature of the mark. 

 

The mark consists of a multi-colored pinwheel design formed from a red semicircle on the top, a blue semicircle on the right, a green semicircle on the bottom, and a yellow semicircle on the left.

 

QUESTIONS

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Marcie R. Frum Milone/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 116

571-272-9726

Marcie.Milone@uspto.gov

(email for informal communications only)

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90026344 - GT-1574-US-1

To: GOOGLE LLC (tmdocket@google.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90026344 - GT-1574-US-1
Sent: September 30, 2020 06:18:31 PM
Sent As: ecom116@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on September 30, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90026344

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Marcie R. Frum Milone/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 116

571-272-9726

Marcie.Milone@uspto.gov

(email for informal communications only)

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from September 30, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed