Offc Action Outgoing

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  January 05, 2022

 

The trademark examining attorney issued a final Office action on May 25, 2021.  On November 25, 2021, applicant responded by filing a request for reconsideration of the final Office action.  Applicant’s request raises a new issue; therefore, this nonfinal Office action is being issued to address the new issue.  See TMEP §715.03(b). 

 

This nonfinal Office action supersedes the previous final Office action.  Applicant should not file an appeal at this time as it would be considered premature.  See 15 U.S.C. §1070; 37 C.F.R. §2.141(a); TMEP §715.03(b).

 

The following refusal from the final Office action remains outstanding:  Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Merely Descriptive. 

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

• NEW:  Supplemental Register
• Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Merely Descriptive

 

SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER

 

Registration is refused on the Supplemental Register because the proposed mark is not in lawful use in commerce, as required by Trademark Act Section 23.  See 15 U.S.C. §1091(a); 37 C.F.R. §2.47(a); TMEP §714.05(a)(i).  Specifically, this application is based on applicant’s bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce under Section 1(b), and applicant has not yet submitted an amendment to allege use under 37 C.F.R. §2.76.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.47(d), 2.75(b); TMEP §§815.02, 1102.03.

 

This refusal will be withdrawn if applicant (1) deletes the amendment to the Supplemental Register, or (2) submits an amendment to allege use that meets the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(b), (c).  See TMEP §§815.02, 1102.03.

 

If applicant maintains the amendment to the Supplemental Register and provides an acceptable amendment to allege use, the effective filing date of the application will be the date on which applicant met the minimum filing requirements of 37 C.F.R. §2.76(c) for the amendment to allege use.  37 C.F.R. §2.75(b); TMEP §§816.02, 1102.03.  In addition, the undersigned trademark examining attorney will conduct a new search of the USPTO records for conflicting marks based on the later application filing date.  TMEP §§206.01, 1102.03.

 

Applicant should note the following additional ground for refusal.

 

SECTION 2(e)(1) REFUSAL - MERELY DESCRIPTIVE

 

The refusal under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) is continued and maintained for the reasons set forth in the final Office action issued on May 25, 2021.  See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b).

 

Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal(s) by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Response guidelines.  For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Marta Stadeli/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 123

(571) 272-6747

marta.stadeli@uspto.gov

 

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

• Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

• Responses signed by an unauthorized party are not accepted and can cause the application to abandon.  If applicant does not have an attorney, the response must be signed by the individual applicant, all joint applicants, or someone with legal authority to bind a juristic applicant.  If applicant has an attorney, the response must be signed by the attorney.

 

• If needed, find contact information for the supervisor of the office or unit listed in the signature block.

 

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on January 05, 2022 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90021655

 

A USPTO examining attorney has reviewed your trademark application and issued an Office action.  You must respond to this Office action in order to avoid your application abandoning.  Follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the Office action HERE.  This email is NOT the Office action.

 

(2)  Respond to the Office action by the deadline using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  Your response must be received by the USPTO on or before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  Otherwise, your application will be abandoned.  See the Office action itself regarding how to respond.

 

(3)  Direct general questions about using USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and whether there are outstanding deadlines to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

After reading the Office action, address any question(s) regarding the specific content to the USPTO examining attorney identified in the Office action.

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO may mail or email you trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  The USPTO will only email official USPTO correspondence from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

·         Hiring a U.S.-licensed attorney.  If you do not have an attorney and are not required to have one under the trademark rules, we encourage you to hire a U.S.-licensed attorney specializing in trademark law to help guide you through the registration process.  The USPTO examining attorney identified above is not your attorney and cannot give you legal advice, but rather works for and represents the USPTO in trademark matters.