To: | Sailun Tire Americas Inc. (ny.trademark@dorsey.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90021432 - THE ROAD IS YOUR PREY - 474653- |
Sent: | October 01, 2020 07:50:20 AM |
Sent As: | ecom120@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90021432
Mark: THE ROAD IS YOUR PREY
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Sailun Tire Americas Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 474653-
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 01, 2020
The preliminary amendment dated July 6, 2020, amending the identification of goods and services is not acceptable for the reasons stated in this Office action. Thus, the previous wording in the original identification remains operative for purposes of future amendments and for determining the scope of future amendments. See TMEP §1402.07(d).
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
REQUIREMENT: IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
In this case, the application originally only identified the following definite goods:
Class 12 Tires
However, the proposed amendment also identifies services, specifically, the following services:
Class 35 Retail and wholesale sale of tires
This portion of the proposed amendment is beyond the scope of the original identification because applicant’s original identification only identified goods, and applicant adds on completely new service, namely, a retail and wholesale service. It is immaterial that these retail services feature tires – they are not a within the scope of tires, as they are not tires, nor are they goods at all.
Applicant must confirm to the original wording and restrict its identification to Class 12:
Class 12 Tires
Although amendment to include Class 35 is automatically rejected and the original Identification will control, if applicant does not provide a rebuttal argument, applicant still must respond to this requirement to confirm that it accepts the reversion.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and/or services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
FOREIGN REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE REQUIRED
An application with a Section 44(e) basis must include a true copy, photocopy, certification, or certified copy of a foreign registration from an applicant’s country of origin. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01, 1016. In addition, an applicant’s country of origin must be a party to a convention or treaty relating to trademarks to which the United States is also a party, or must extend reciprocal registration rights to nationals of the United States by law. 15 U.S.C. §1126(b); TMEP §§1002.01, 1004.
Therefore, applicant must provide a copy of the foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin when it becomes available. TMEP §1003.04(a). A copy of a foreign registration must consist of a document issued to an applicant by, or certified by, the intellectual property office in applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1004.01. If applicant’s country of origin does not issue registrations or Madrid Protocol certificates of extension of protection, applicant may submit a copy of the Madrid Protocol international registration that shows that protection of the international registration has been extended to applicant’s country of origin. TMEP §1016. In addition, applicant must also provide an English translation if the foreign registration is not written in English. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii); TMEP §1004.01(a)-(b). The translation should be signed by the translator. TMEP §1004.01(b).
If the foreign registration has not yet issued, or applicant requires additional time to procure a copy of the foreign registration (and English translation, as appropriate), applicant should so inform the trademark examining attorney and request that the U.S. application be suspended until a copy of the foreign registration is available. TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04(b).
If applicant cannot satisfy the requirements of a Section 44(e) basis, applicant may request that the mark be approved for publication based solely on the Section 1(b) basis. See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.04(b), 1003.04(b). Although the mark may be approved for publication on the Section 1(b) basis, it will not register until an acceptable allegation of use has been filed. See 15 U.S.C. §1051(c)-(d); 37 C.F.R. §§2.76, 2.88; TMEP §1103. Please note that, if the U.S. application satisfied the requirements of Section 44(d) as of the U.S. application filing date, applicant may retain the priority filing date under Section 44(d) without perfecting the Section 44(e) basis, provided there is a continuing valid basis for registration. See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(3)-(4); TMEP §§806.02(f), 806.04(b).
Alternatively, applicant has the option to amend the application to rely solely on the Section 44(e) basis and request deletion of the Section 1(b) basis. See 37 C.F.R. §2.35(b)(1); TMEP §806.04. The foreign registration alone may serve as the basis for obtaining a U.S. registration. See 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3); TMEP §806.01(d).
ASSISTANCE
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/benjaminrosen/
Benjamin Rosen
Examining Attorney
Law Office 120
(571) 272-8425
benjamin.rosen@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE