Petition to Director Granted

MASTER V6

CERAGEM Co., Ltd.

TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 90021419 - MASTER V6 - 512310

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
To: CERAGEM Co., Ltd. (rockmail@reinhartlaw.com)
Subject: TRADEMARK APPLICATION NO. 90021419 - MASTER V6 - 512310
Sent: 5/25/2021 9:22:17 PM
Sent As: ECOMPET
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 90021419

 

Mark:  MASTER V6

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

       Gordon M. Wright

       REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN P.C.

       2215 PERRYGREEN WAY

       ROCKFORD IL 61107

      

 

 

 

 

 

Owner:  CERAGEM Co., Ltd.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 512310

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       rockmail@reinhartlaw.com

 

 

 

PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED

 

 

Issue date:  May 25, 2021

 

The petition to the Director in the trademark application above is GRANTED.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.146(a)(3). 

 

The application will be returned to the assigned trademark examining attorney to consider petitioner’s request to amend the basis from Section 1(b) to Section 44(e) of the Trademark Act.  If the examining attorney accepts the amendment, the application will be republished.  If the examining attorney refuses it, applicant will be notified of the refusal.

 

The examining attorney will notify the applicant by telephone or email of the reasons why the amendment is unacceptable.  The applicant may then (1) agree to delete the Section 1(b) basis so that an examiner's amendment and/or appropriate Office action regarding the requested basis amendment can be issued; (2) withdraw the request to amend the basis; or (3) request that the amendment remain pending until a statement of use (SOU) is filed.  See Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure (TMEP) §806.03(j). 

                                                    

Please note that since you requested to maintain the Section 1(b) basis pending consideration of the amendment to Section 44(e), the notice of allowance (NOA) will not be cancelled and the Section 1(b) basis will not be deleted unless the amendment is accepted.  Therefore, if prior to the acceptance of the amendment by the examining attorney, you fail to file either an SOU or a request for an extension of time to file an SOU (extension request) when due, the application will be abandoned and a petition to revive will be required to reinstate the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.66, 2.89; TMEP §806.03(j).  

 

 

 

 

/Jolie Washington/

Paralegal Specialist

Office of the Deputy Commissioner

for Trademark Examination Policy

jolie.washington@uspto.gov

571-272-9583

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed