To: | GOOGLE LLC (tmdocket@google.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 90011513 - DEMAND - GT-1578-US-1 |
Sent: | July 29, 2020 04:27:22 PM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 Attachment - 21 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 90011513
Mark: DEMAND
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: GOOGLE LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. GT-1578-US-1
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: July 29, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
This application was filed with the USPTO on June 19, 2020.
Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion
THIS PARTIAL REFUSAL APPLIES TO CLASS 035 ONLY
Applicant’s mark is DEMAND in standard characters for, in relevant part, “Advertising and promotional services; promotional services in the form of sharing of multimedia content via the Internet and other communications networks; providing marketing research, consulting, programs, analysis, reporting services and business information for advertisers, marketers, partners and content providers in the field of live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness; outsource service provider in the field of business analytics; providing use of on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing data about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness” in class 035.
Registrant’s mark for Registration No. 5130594 is DEMAND RATING in standard characters with the wording RATING disclaimed for, in relevant part, “Market research and analysis services; collection of market research information by tracking of consumer behavior on the internet through detection of streaming, downloading and uploading of music, video, literary works and other content, as well as other data associated with that content; provision of reports and other analytics in relation to all of the aforesaid market research information; consulting services in relation to all of the aforesaid market research information” in class 035.
Registrant’s mark is for Registration No. 5608844 is DEMAND ML in standard characters for “Business consulting services, namely, providing information and advisory on marking analysis, pricing analysis, and demand generation processes for others; business management consulting and advisory services; Supply chain management consulting services”.
Although not all du Pont factors may be relevant, there are generally two key considerations in any likelihood of confusion analysis: (1) the similarities between the compared marks and (2) the relatedness of the compared goods and/or services. See In re i.am.symbolic, llc, 866 F.3d at 1322, 123 USPQ2d at 1747 (quoting Herbko Int’l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 1164-65, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002)); Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co.,544 F.2d 1098, 1103, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (C.C.P.A. 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by [Section] 2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of differences in the essential characteristics of the goods [or services] and differences in the marks.”); TMEP §1207.01.
Comparison of Marks
Marks are compared in their entireties for similarities in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. Stone Lion Capital Partners, LP v. Lion Capital LLP, 746 F.3d 1317, 1321, 110 USPQ2d 1157, 1160 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (quoting Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1371, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1691 (Fed. Cir. 2005)); TMEP §1207.01(b)-(b)(v). “Similarity in any one of these elements may be sufficient to find the marks confusingly similar.” In re Inn at St. John’s, LLC, 126 USPQ2d 1742, 1746 (TTAB 2018) (citing In re Davia, 110 USPQ2d 1810, 1812 (TTAB 2014)), aff’d per curiam, 777 F. App’x 516, 2019 BL 343921 (Fed. Cir. 2019); TMEP §1207.01(b).
Applicant’s mark is DEMAND in standard characters.
Registrant’s mark for Registration No. 5130594 is DEMAND RATING in standard characters with the wording RATING disclaimed. Although marks are compared in their entireties, one feature of a mark may be more significant or dominant in creating a commercial impression. See In re Viterra Inc., 671 F.3d 1358, 1362, 101 USPQ2d 1905, 1908 (Fed. Cir. 2012); In re Nat’l Data Corp., 753 F.2d 1056, 1058, 224 USPQ 749, 751 (Fed. Cir. 1985); TMEP §1207.01(b)(viii), (c)(ii). Disclaimed matter that is descriptive of or generic for a party’s goods and/or services is typically less significant or less dominant when comparing marks. In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1305, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1050 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (citing In re Dixie Rests., Inc., 105 F.3d 1405, 1407, 41 USPQ2d 1531, 1533-34 (Fed. Cir. 1997)); TMEP §1207.01(b)(viii), (c)(ii). Thus, the wording DEMAND is the dominant portion of the mark.
Registrant’s mark for Registration No. 5608844 is DEMAND ML in standard characters. Consumers are generally more inclined to focus on the first word, prefix, or syllable in any trademark or service mark. See Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee En 1772, 396 F.3d 1369, 1372, 73 USPQ2d 1689, 1692 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (finding similarity between VEUVE ROYALE and two VEUVE CLICQUOT marks in part because “VEUVE . . . remains a ‘prominent feature’ as the first word in the mark and the first word to appear on the label”); Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Century Life of Am., 970 F.2d 874, 876, 23 USPQ2d 1698, 1700 (Fed Cir. 1992) (finding similarity between CENTURY 21 and CENTURY LIFE OF AMERICA in part because “consumers must first notice th[e] identical lead word”); see also In re Detroit Athletic Co., 903 F.3d 1297, 1303, 128 USPQ2d 1047, 1049 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (finding “the identity of the marks’ two initial words is particularly significant because consumers typically notice those words first”). The mark begins with the wording DEMAND, which leaves the stronger impression in consumers’ minds.
The dominant portions of all the marks consist of the wording DEMAND, thus, the marks create similar commercial impressions.
Comparison of Goods/Services
Applicant’s services are, in relevant part, “Advertising and promotional services; promotional services in the form of sharing of multimedia content via the Internet and other communications networks; providing marketing research, consulting, programs, analysis, reporting services and business information for advertisers, marketers, partners and content providers in the field of live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness; outsource service provider in the field of business analytics; providing use of on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing data about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness” in class 035.
Registrant’s services for Registration No. 5130594 are, in relevant part, “Market research and analysis services; collection of market research information by tracking of consumer behavior on the internet through detection of streaming, downloading and uploading of music, video, literary works and other content, as well as other data associated with that content; provision of reports and other analytics in relation to all of the aforesaid market research information; consulting services in relation to all of the aforesaid market research information” in class 035.
Registrant’s services is for Registration No. 5608844 are for “Business consulting services, namely, providing information and advisory on marking analysis, pricing analysis, and demand generation processes for others; business management consulting and advisory services; Supply chain management consulting services”.
All of the services involve various types of marketing research and analysis for business purposes.
Therefore, the services are closely related and consumers will be confused as to the source of the services.
Applicant should note the following additional ground for refusal.
Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Merely Descriptive
Applicant’s mark is DEMAND for “Advertising and promotional services; promotional services in the form of sharing of multimedia content via the Internet and other communications networks; providing marketing research, consulting, programs, analysis, reporting services and business information for advertisers, marketers, partners and content providers in the field of live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness; outsource service provider in the field of business analytics; providing use of on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing data about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness” in Class 035 and “Providing temporary use of non-downloadable analytics software, namely, software that provides statistics about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness” in Class 042.
The word DEMAND means “the desire for goods or services in an economy, measured as the amount people are used to buy at a given price”. Please see attached dictionary definition from the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. Applicant’s services involve providing information and data in the field of market demands in the field of tickets. Please see attached excerpts from the Google blog, Forbes and Ticket News.
Therefore, the applied-for mark is merely descriptive of applicant’s services.
Identification and Classification of Services
Class 035: Advertising and promotional services; promotional services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others through distribution of advertising multimedia content via the Internet and other communications networks; providing marketing research, consulting, programs, analysis, reporting services and business information for advertisers, marketers, partners and content providers in the field of live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness; outsource service provider in the field of business analytics
Class 042: Providing temporary use of non-downloadable analytics software, namely, software that provides statistics about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness; providing use of on-line non-downloadable software for analyzing data about live entertainment events, artist trends, ticketing pricing, venues and announcement effectiveness.
Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended. See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Janet Lee
/Janet H. Lee/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 124
Phone: (571) 272-1053
Email: janet.lee6@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE