To: | Johnson & Johnson (tmus@its.jnj.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88939090 - ACM ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT - T45734US1 |
Sent: | August 25, 2020 01:33:54 PM |
Sent As: | ecom124@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88939090
Mark: ACM ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Johnson & Johnson
|
|
Reference/Docket No. T45734US1
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 25, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES:
SEARCH RESULTS
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Applicant must disclaim “ACM ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT” because it is merely descriptive of an ingredient, quality, characteristic, function, feature, purpose, or use of applicant’s goods and/or services. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(e)(1); DuoProSS Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Med. Devices, Ltd., 695 F.3d 1247, 1251, 103 USPQ2d 1753, 1755 (Fed. Cir. 2012); TMEP §§1213, 1213.03(a).
The attached evidence from American Heritage Dictionary shows that “advance” or “advanced” refers to something “highly developed or complex,” “case” is a particular instance of something, and “management” is the act of directing or administering. Further, the attached evidence from Wikipedia shows that “ACM” is a known acronym for “advanced case management,” and refers to the coordination of a service request in fields such as healthcare. Applicant’s services are “an online portal for use by healthcare practitioners for tracking, ordering, and managing surgical implants and instruments; an online portal for use by healthcare practitioners for managing patient surgeries” (emphasis added). Thus, the wording merely describes applicant’s services because the services are a highly developed way for coordinating or directing instances of supply orders and scheduled surgeries.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “ACM ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Identification of Services
The identification of services is indefinite, too broad, and must be clarified because the nature of the services is unclear. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Services for “providing an Internet website portal” are classified based on the subject matter of the portal. If applicant is “providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software,” applicant must so specify, and classify its services in International Class 42.
To address the problematic wording discussed above, applicant may adopt any or all of the following identification of services, if accurate. Suggested changes are indicated in bold, strikethrough, and underlined fonts.
International Class 42: an online portal Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software with a portal interface for use by healthcare practitioners for
tracking, ordering, and managing surgical implants and instruments; an online portal Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software
with a portal interface for use by healthcare practitioners for managing patient surgeries.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Due to the descriptive wording in the applied-for mark, applicant must provide the following information and documentation regarding the goods and/or services and wording appearing in the mark:
(1) Fact sheets, instruction manuals, brochures, advertisements and pertinent screenshots of applicant’s website as it relates to the goods and/or services in the application, including any materials using the terms in the applied-for mark. Merely stating that information about the goods and/or services is available on applicant’s website is insufficient to make the information of record.;
(2) If these materials are unavailable, applicant should submit similar documentation for goods and services of the same type, explaining how its own product or services will differ. If the goods and/or services feature new technology and information regarding competing goods and/or services is not available, applicant must provide a detailed factual description of the goods and/or services. Factual information about the goods must make clear how they operate, salient features, and prospective customers and channels of trade. For services, the factual information must make clear what the services are and how they are rendered, salient features, and prospective customers and channels of trade. Conclusory statements will not satisfy this requirement.; and
(3) Applicant must respond to the following questions:
- Will applicant’s services provide advanced case management for its consumers?
- Is “ADVANCE CASE MANAGEMENT” a term of art in the applicant’s field? If so, what does it mean?
See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§814, 1402.01(e).
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
Responding to this Office action
Response guidelines. For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/April Reeves/
April E. Reeves
Examining Attorney
Law Office 124
(571) 272-3681
april.reeves@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE