| To: | XU, Lei (yi.wan@tbchadwick.com) |
| Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88858408 - REDUMP - BSF0033118 |
| Sent: | May 13, 2020 12:10:42 PM |
| Sent As: | ecom103@uspto.gov |
| Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
|
U.S. Application Serial No. 88858408
Mark: REDUMP
|
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
|
Applicant: XU, Lei
|
|
|
Reference/Docket No. BSF0033118
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: May 13, 2020
SEARCH OF USPTO DATABASE OF MARKS
MOCK-UP SPECIMEN DOES NOT SHOW USE IN COMMERCE – SUBSTITUTE SPECIMEN REQUIRED
An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce for each international class of services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. 15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a); 1301.01 et seq. “Use in commerce” means (1) a bona fide use of the applied-for mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is used in the sale, advertising, or rendering of the services, and (3) the services are actually rendered in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1127.
An image of business signage, such as on a storefront or delivery van, or a webpage that has been digitally created or altered to include the mark, or a mockup of how the mark may be displayed, is not a proper specimen for services because it does not show actual use of the mark in commerce. Similarly, a website showing the mark for the services that applicant is not currently engaged in selling, advertising, or rendering is not a proper specimen. See 15 U.S.C. §1127; 37 C.F.R. §2.56(c); TMEP §§904.07(a), 1301.04(g)(i).
In this case, applicant has submitted several applications all utilizing the identical webpage describing the same services and showing the same video game (known as Fruit Ninja) with only the name of the game changed on each page to correspond with the mark in the relevant applications. This indicates that these pages were merely created for use as a specimen and do not show the marks used in commerce with the identified services. Therefore the specimen does not show actual use of the mark in commerce.
Applicant may respond to the specimen refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class, and the requirement for additional information/documentation, if applicable:
(1) Submit the additional information/documentation referenced above establishing that the original specimen was actually used in commerce as of the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.
(2) Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the services identified in the application or amendment to allege use. A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.” The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement. For instructions on how to submit a different specimen using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.
Applicant must also fully respond to the requirement for additional information and documentation referenced above for any different specimen provided. Failure to comply with a requirement to furnish information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Merely stating that information is available on applicant’s or a third party website or providing a hyperlink of such a website is an insufficient response and will not make the additional information or materials of record. See In re Planalytics, Inc., 70 USPQ2d 1453, 1457-58 (TTAB 2004).
(3) Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) (which includes withdrawing an amendment to allege use, if one was filed), as no specimen is required before publication. This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements, including a specimen.
If applicant amends the basis, the requirement for additional information and documentation referenced above will be withdrawn.
INFORMATION ABOUT SPECIMEN AND USE IN U.S. COMMERCE REQUIRED
To permit proper examination of the application record for compliance with use in commerce requirements, applicant must respond to the following requests for information and documentation about the specimen(s). See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §814. Answer for each specimen/photograph/image previously provided. For any webpage submission, either as a specimen or as supporting evidence, provide a digital copy of the entire webpage from top to bottom, as rendered in an Internet browser, that includes the URL and access or print date. TMEP §710.01(b) (citing In re I-Coat Co., 126 USPQ2d 1730, 1733 (TTAB 2018)).
(1) Identify the particular service(s) listed in the application for which the specimen(s) was submitted to show use of the mark.
(2) Does applicant provide the identical game development services under multiple marks?
(3) Explain whether the specimen was created for submission with this application. If so, specify the date each specimen was created. If applicant obtained the content of the webpage or image(s) of the mark in connection with the services shown in the specimen(s) from a third-party website, provide the URL of the website and a digital copy of relevant webpage(s) for each image.
(4) Provide information about how applicant advertises the services and representative examples from online or print sources showing how the mark appears in applicant’s advertising of the services. Provide the name of the online or print source and a complete copy of the webpage(s) or print page(s) showing the services advertised for sale. For each source, specify when the services were first advertised for sale and if the services are still advertised for sale in that environment.
(5) For the services identified in response to question (1), specify the date the services were first rendered or provided to or within the United States, the dollar amount of sales with or within the United States, and provide at least three invoices or other supporting documentation that show payments or other consideration made, redacting personal or private information of buyers as necessary.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL SPECIMENS
Given the wide variety and range of services that applicant has listed in the application, applicant must submit additional specimens to allow for a complete and accurate examination of the application and assessment of the registrability of the subject mark, in accordance with Rule 2.61(b). 37 C.F.R. § 2.61(b); see TMEP § 904.01(a). Moreover, applicant must also support with verifiable evidence proper actual use in commerce of the mark for all goods requested here. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051(a), 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56; TMEP §§ 904, 904.07(a); cf. Grand Canyon W. Ranch LLC v. Hualapai Tribe, 78 USPQ2d 1696, 1698 (TTAB 2006) (“an applicant who bases its application on Section 1(a) (use in commerce) but who did not use the mark on some or all of the goods or services identified in the application may "cure" this problem by amending its basis to Section 1(b)”). The Trademark Act defines “commerce” as commerce that may be lawfully regulated by the U.S. Congress. See 15 U.S.C. §1127. “Use in commerce” means (1) the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade (and not merely to reserve a right in the mark), (2) the mark is placed in any manner on the goods, packaging, tags or labels, or displays of the goods at their point of sale, and (3) the goods are actually sold or transported in commerce. See 15 U.S.C. §1127.
Please note that for every specimen submitted, applicant must clearly provide the common commercial name for the goods to which such specimen relates in order to permit proper examination of the goods.
Applicant should submit specimens demonstrating use of the mark on all of the following services:
1. Computer programming; Computer software design; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS);
2. Creating and maintaining web sites for others;
3. Information technology consulting services; Outsource service providers in the field of information technology;
4. Maintenance of computer software;
5. Providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website;
6. Rental of computer software.
If applicant is unable to provide specimens to support use of these items, applicant must delete these entries, or amend the filing basis for those goods that were not in proper use as of the application filing date to an intent to use basis under Section 1(b). This option will later necessitate additional fees and filing requirements such as providing a specimen for these goods at a subsequent date.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Jacob Vigil/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
571-270-3586
jacob.vigil@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE
