To: | Orion Corporation (chiustm@ladas.net) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88739588 - JEJU VOLCANIC MINERAL WATER - 3T19727162 |
Sent: | March 26, 2020 01:52:26 PM |
Sent As: | ecom121@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 Attachment - 16 Attachment - 17 Attachment - 18 Attachment - 19 Attachment - 20 Attachment - 21 Attachment - 22 Attachment - 23 Attachment - 24 Attachment - 25 Attachment - 26 Attachment - 27 Attachment - 28 Attachment - 29 Attachment - 30 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88739588
Mark: JEJU VOLCANIC MINERAL WATER
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Orion Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 3T19727162
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 26, 2020
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
Search of Office’s Database of Marks
Summary of Issues
· Section 2(e)(2 ) Refusal: Mark is Primarily Geographically Descriptive
· Supplemental Register Advisory
Section 2(e)(2 ) Refusal: Mark is Primarily Geographically Descriptive
Applicant’s Mark is:
A mark is primarily geographically descriptive when the following is demonstrated:
(1) The primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public is a generally known location;
(2) The goods or services originate in the place identified in the mark; and
(3) The purchasing public would be likely to believe that the goods or services originate in the geographic place identified in the mark; that is, to make a goods-place or services-place association.
TMEP §1210.01(a); see In re Societe Generale des Eaux Minerales de Vittel S.A., 824 F.2d 957, 959, 3 USPQ2d 1450, 1452 (Fed. Cir. 1987); In re Hollywood Lawyers Online, 110 USPQ2d 1852, 1853 (TTAB 2014); see also In re Newbridge Cutlery Co., 776 F.3d 854, 860-61, 113 USPQ2d 1445, 1448-49 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
Here, the primary significance of the mark to the purchasing public is a generally known location. This is shown in the attached evidence from the CNN Travel, Wikipedia and Science Daily websites. These sources show that the Jeju island, located in South Korea, is a world famous tourism spot known for being an active volcano.
Further, the goods originate in the place identified in the mark. This is shown in the attached evidence from the Korea JoongAng Daily website, which explains that applicant’s goods are filtered through “Jeju” basalt, and from the IF World Design Guide website, which explains that “[t]he Orion Corp. has launched a high-concentration mineral water from the Jeju volcanic island of South Korea.”
Lastly, the purchasing public would be likely to believe that the goods or services originate in the geographic place identified in the mark; that is, to make a goods-place or services-place association. The USPTO has long held that a goods-place or services-place association is presumed where (1) the location in the mark is generally known to the purchasing public, (2) the term’s geographical significance is its primary significance, and (3) the goods and/or services do, in fact, originate from the named location in the mark. TMEP §1210.04; see, e.g., In re Cal. Pizza Kitchen Inc., 10 USPQ2d 1704, 1705 (TTAB 1988) (finding a services-place association was presumed between applicant’s restaurant services and California because the services originated in California); In re Handler Fenton Ws., Inc., 214 USPQ 848, 850 (TTAB 1982) (finding a goods-place association was presumed between applicant’s t-shirts and Denver because the goods had their geographical origin in Denver); see also In re Nantucket, Inc., 677 F.2d 95, 102, 213 USPQ 889, 895 (C.C.P.A. 1982) (Nies, J., concurring) (“[W]e must start with the concept that a geographic name of a place of business is a descriptive term when used on the goods of that business. There is a public goods/place association, in effect, presumed.” (internal footnote removed)). Here, the previously referenced evidence shows that “JEJU” is a generally known to the purchasing public, that the term’s geographical significance is its primary significance, and that the goods do originate in the place named in the mark. Thus, the association is presumed.
The addition of generic or highly descriptive wording to a geographic word or term does not diminish that geographic word or term’s primary geographic significance. TMEP §1210.02(c)(ii); see, e.g., In re Hollywood Lawyers Online, 110 USPQ2d 1852, 1853-54 (TTAB 2014) (holding HOLLYWOOD LAWYERS ONLINE primarily geographically descriptive of attorney referrals, online business information, and an online business directory); In re Cheezwhse.com, Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1917, 1920 (TTAB 2008) (holding NORMANDIE CAMEMBERT primarily geographically descriptive of cheese). Here, “VOLCANIC” is descriptive in that Jeju Island is an active volcano, as shown in the previously referenced evidence. The Korea JoongAng Daily website explains that applicant’s goods are in fact, filtered through “volcanic” basalt from Jeju. Further, the attached evidence from the Korea JoongAng Daily website explains that the water applicant provides is a “mineral water”. Further, the attached evidence from the Bon Appetit website, shows that “mineral water” is a type of water. Applicant provides “water beverages”, so “mineral water” is descriptive of the type of water applicant provides.
Supplemental Register Advisory
Applicant may submit a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “MINERAL WATER” apart from the mark as shown.
TMEP §1213.08(a)(i).
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
Response to Office Action
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
Rosen, Amanda
/Amanda Rosen/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
(571) 270-5984
Amanda.Rosen@USPTO.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE