Offc Action Outgoing

BD ELIENCE

Becton, Dickinson and Company

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88732196 - BD ELIENCE - TMK202067BDU

To: Becton, Dickinson and Company (dawn.harley@bd.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88732196 - BD ELIENCE - TMK202067BDU
Sent: June 23, 2020 07:57:41 AM
Sent As: ecom102@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88732196

 

Mark:  BD ELIENCE

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Becton, Dickinson and Company

1 Becton Drive

Franklin Lakes NJ 07417

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  Becton, Dickinson and Company

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. TMK202067BDU

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 dawn.harley@bd.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  June 23, 2020

 

This application was approved for publication on May 1, 2020.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.80.  However, approval of the application has been withdrawn to address the issue(s) below.  See TMEP §706.01.  The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause applicant.

 

Class 9 Identification Unacceptable In Part-Amendment Required

The wording “Specimen transport containers, petri dishes, anaerobic jars and coagulation timers” in International Class 9 is partially indefinite and overly broad as follows.  The wording “Specimen transport containers” is indefinite and could encompass goods in other multiple classes.  Applicant must amend this wording to further specify the common commercial name of the goods.  For example, the wording “Nonmetal containers for the transport and storage of organs, tissues and cells for medical and scientific purposes” is acceptable in International Class 20; the wording “Containers and trays specially designed for transporting and holding radiopharmaceuticals” is acceptable in International Class 10; the wording “petri dishes; coagulation timers” is acceptable as previously amended in International Class 9; the wording “anaerobic jars sold empty for laboratory use” is acceptable in International Class 9.

 

The wording “Automated laboratory robot and related operating software, accessories and consumables which prepares liquid-based, thin layer cellular samples from a cell suspension for use in medical, clinical and scientific procedures and devices for use therewith, namely, vials, tubes, disposable kits, pipettes, settling chambers and slides” in International Class 9 is indefinite and overly broad as to “and related operating software, accessories and consumables” and must be amended to further specify the common commercial name or type of the goods.  The wording “Operating software” is indefinite because it does not indicate whether the software is downloadable or recorded, which is required for classification in International Class 9.  Under Nice 11-2019, identifications for computer programs/software in Class 9 must (1) indicate the function and, if applicable, the content and/or particular field of use of the goods, AND (2) specify that the goods are “downloadable” and/or “recorded.”  The wording “and related…accessories” is indefinite and overbroad.  The common commercial name of the accessories must be further specified for accurate classification.  See TMEP §1402.03(a).   For example, the wording “Automated laboratory robot and related recorded operating software, which prepares liquid-based, thin layer cellular samples from a cell suspension for use in medical, clinical and scientific procedures and devices for use therewith, namely, vials, tubes, disposable lab testing kits, pipettes, settling chambers and slides, sold as a unit therewith” is acceptable in International Class 9.

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Additional Class Requirements

The application identifies goods and/or services in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods and/or services that may be classified in at least five classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only four class(es).  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 37 C.F.R. §2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

For an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Multiple-class Application webpage.

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

 

Ferraiuolo, Dominic

/DominicJFerraiuolo/

Examining Attorney, U.S.P.T.O.

Law Office 102

tel:  571-272-9156

fax: 571-273-9102

dominic.ferraiuolo@uspto.gov

 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88732196 - BD ELIENCE - TMK202067BDU

To: Becton, Dickinson and Company (dawn.harley@bd.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88732196 - BD ELIENCE - TMK202067BDU
Sent: June 23, 2020 07:57:42 AM
Sent As: ecom102@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on June 23, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88732196

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Ferraiuolo, Dominic

/DominicJFerraiuolo/

Examining Attorney, U.S.P.T.O.

Law Office 102

tel:  571-272-9156

fax: 571-273-9102

dominic.ferraiuolo@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from June 23, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed