To: | Connected Financial Solutions (kaushik.chakravarti@connectedfi.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88671187 - TESS - N/A |
Sent: | March 30, 2020 05:14:46 PM |
Sent As: | ecom109@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88671187
Mark: TESS
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Connected Financial Solutions
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 30, 2020
This Office action is supplemental to and supersedes the previous Office action issued on February 6, 2020, in connection with this application. The assigned trademark examining attorney inadvertently omitted a potential basis for refusal of registration relevant to the mark in the subject application. See TMEP §§706, 711.02. Specifically, the examining attorney did not cite earlier-filed application Ser. No. 88310573 as a potential bar to registration of applicant’s mark.
The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the delay in raising this issue.
Applicant must address all issues raised in this Office action, in addition to the issues raised in the Office action dated February 6, 2020. The issues raised in the previous Office action are maintained:
The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:
• NEW ISSUE: ADDITIONAL PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION
• INQUIRY – WHETHER MARK IDENTIFIES A LIVING INDIVIDUAL
Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office action and the previous Office action, within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action. 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02. If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned. 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).
PRIOR-FILED APPLICATIONS
The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02. However, the marks in prior-filed pending applications may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.
The filing dates of pending U.S. Application Serial Nos. 87471844 and 88310573 precede applicant’s filing date. See attached referenced applications. If one or more of the marks in the referenced applications register, applicant’s mark may be refused registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d) because of a likelihood of confusion with the registered marks. See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. Therefore, upon receipt of applicant’s response to this Office action, action on this application may be suspended pending final disposition of the earlier-filed referenced applications.
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the marks in the referenced applications. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
If applicant responds to the above advisory, applicant must also respond to the requirement set forth below
INQUIRY – WHETHER MARK IDENTIFIES A LIVING INDIVIDUAL
Applicant must clarify whether the name TESS in the mark identifies a particular living individual. See 37 C.F.R. §2.61(b); TMEP §§813, 1206.03. In this case, the application neither specifies whether the name in the mark identifies a particular living individual nor includes a written consent. See TMEP §§813.01(a)-(b), 1206.04(a), 1206.05.
To register a mark that consists of or comprises the name of a particular living individual, including a first name, pseudonym, stage name, or nickname, an applicant must provide a written consent personally signed by the named individual. 15 U.S.C. §1052(c); TMEP §§813, 1206.04(a).
Accordingly, if the name in the mark does not identify a particular living individual, applicant must submit a statement to that effect (e.g., “The name shown in the mark does not identify a particular living individual.”).
However, if the name in the mark does identify a particular living individual, applicant must submit both of the following:
(1) The following statement: “The name shown in the mark identifies a living individual whose consent to register is made of record.” If the name is a pseudonym, stage name, or nickname, applicant must provide the following statement: “TESS identifies <specify actual name>, a living individual whose consent is of record.”
(2) A written consent, personally signed by the named individual, as follows: “I, <specify name>, consent to the use and registration of my name, TESS, as a trademark and/or service mark with the USPTO.”
For an overview of the requirements pertaining to names appearing in marks, and instructions on how to satisfy this requirement online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) response form, please go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/law/consent.jsp .
Failure to comply with a request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley , 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Roger T. McDorman/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 109
571-272-5224
roger.mcdorman@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE