Offc Action Outgoing

MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG

SHANGHAI MOONTON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88666723 - MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG - 53666

To: SHANGHAI MOONTON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (trademarks@dbllawyers.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88666723 - MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG - 53666
Sent: July 20, 2020 01:13:57 PM
Sent As: ecom105@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88666723

 

Mark:  MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

Thomas M. Dunlap

DUNLAP BENNETT & LUDWIG PLLC

211 CHURCH STREET SE

211 CHURCH STREET SE

LEESBURG VA 20175

 

 

Applicant:  SHANGHAI MOONTON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. 53666

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 trademarks@dbllawyers.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  July 20, 2020

 

This Office action is supplemental to the previous Office action issued on February 3, 2020 in connection with this application.  The assigned trademark examining attorney inadvertently omitted a refusal of registration relevant to the mark in the subject application.  See TMEP §§706, 711.02.  Specifically, the specimens submitted for Class 9 are not acceptable.

 

The trademark examining attorney apologizes for any inconvenience caused by the delay in raising this issue. 

 

The following requirements have been satisfied:  identification of services amendment requirement, disclaimer requirement, and mark description amendment requirement.  See TMEP §713.02.

 

The following is a SUMMARY OF ISSUES that applicant must address:

 

            NEW ISSUE:  Specimen Refusal – Class 9 Only

 

Applicant must respond to all issues raised in this Office within six (6) months of the date of issuance of this Office action.  37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); see TMEP §711.02.  If applicant does not respond within this time limit, the application will be abandoned for Class 9.  37 C.F.R. §2.65(a).

 

SPECIMEN REFUSAL – CLASS 9 ONLY

 

THIS PARTIAL REFUSAL APPLIES TO CLASS 9 ONLY

 

Specimen is not an acceptable display for software.  Registration is refused because the specimen in International Class 9 is not acceptable as a display associated with downloadable software and does not show the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce.  Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127; 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a), (b)(1); TMEP §§904, 904.03(e), (g), 904.07(a).  An application based on Trademark Act Section 1(a) must include a specimen showing the applied-for mark as actually used in commerce for each international class of goods identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  15 U.S.C. §1051(a)(1); 37 C.F.R. §§2.34(a)(1)(iv), 2.56(a); TMEP §§904, 904.07(a). 

 

A display specimen for downloadable software (1) must show use of the mark directly associated with the goods and (2) such use must be of a point-of-sale nature.  37 C.F.R. §2.56(b)(1).  To show use of a point-of-sale nature, a specimen generally must provide sufficient information to enable the user to download or purchase the software from a website.  See TMEP §904.03(a) (citing In re Azteca Sys., Inc., 102 USPQ2d 1955, 1957 (TTAB 2012)). 

 

In this case, the specimen does not provide the means to enable the user to download or purchase the software from the website.  See In re Sones, 590 F.3d 1282, 1286-89, 93 USPQ2d 1118, 1122-24 (Fed. Cir. 2009); In re Azteca Sys., Inc., 102 USPQ2d at 1957; TMEP §904.03(e), (i).  Specifically, the YouTube® webpage shows the software available to download at the app store/google play®, which is not a sufficient means to show how the user can actually download the software. Further, the app store specimen is not acceptable because it only shows the mark in standard characters.

 

Accordingly, such material is mere advertising, which is not acceptable as a specimen for goods.  See In re Siny Corp., 920 F.3d 1331, 1336, 2019 USPQ2d 127099, at *2-3 (Fed. Cir. 2019) (citing Powermatics, Inc. v. Globe Roofing Prods. Co., 341 F.2d 127, 130, 144 USPQ 430, 432 (C.C.P.A. 1965)); see also Avakoff v. S. Pac. Co., 765 F.2d 1097, 1098, 226 USPQ 435, 436 (Fed. Cir. 1985); TMEP §904.04(b), (c). 

 

Examples of specimens.  Specimens for downloadable software include instruction manuals or screen printouts from (1) webpages showing (a) the mark associated with the software and (b) ordering or purchasing information or information sufficient to download the software, (2) the actual program while running that shows the mark in the title bar, or (3) launch screens that show the mark in an introductory message box that appears after opening the program.  See TMEP §904.03(e), (i), (j).  Any webpage printout or screenshot submitted as a specimen must include the webpage’s URL and the date it was accessed or printed.  37 C.F.R. §2.56(c).

 

Response options.  Applicant may respond to this refusal by satisfying one of the following for each applicable international class:

 

(1)        Submit a different specimen (a verified “substitute” specimen) that (a) was in actual use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of an amendment to allege use and (b) shows the mark in actual use in commerce for the software identified in the application or amendment to allege use.  A “verified substitute specimen” is a specimen that is accompanied by the following statement made in a signed affidavit or supported by a declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20:  “The substitute (or new, or originally submitted, if appropriate) specimen(s) was/were in use in commerce at least as early as the filing date of the application or prior to the filing of the amendment to allege use.”  The substitute specimen cannot be accepted without this statement.

 

(2)        Amend the filing basis to intent to use under Section 1(b) (which includes withdrawing an amendment to allege use, if one was filed), as no specimen is required before publication.  This option will later necessitate additional fee(s) and filing requirements, including a specimen.

 

For an overview of the response options referenced above and instructions on how to satisfy these options using the online Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Specimen webpage.  

 

If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, International Class 9 will be deleted from the application.  The application will then proceed with International Classes 41 and 42 only.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)-(a)(1); TMEP §718.02(a).

 

CONTACT INFORMATION

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. 

 

The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.

 

/Molly Segal/

Molly Segal

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

(571) 272-6490

Molly.Segal@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88666723 - MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG - 53666

To: SHANGHAI MOONTON TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (trademarks@dbllawyers.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88666723 - MOBILE LEGENDS BANG BANG - 53666
Sent: July 20, 2020 01:13:58 PM
Sent As: ecom105@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on July 20, 2020 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88666723

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

Segal, Molly

/Molly Segal/

Molly Segal

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 105

(571) 272-6490

Molly.Segal@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from July 20, 2020, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·         Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·         Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·         Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed