To: | RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC. (rthomson@smwb.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88660824 - RADIUS - N/A |
Sent: | August 30, 2020 04:48:19 PM |
Sent As: | ecom115@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88660824
Mark: RADIUS
|
|
Correspondence Address: 983 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 104C
|
|
Applicant: RISK MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, INC.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 30, 2020
INTRODUCTION
The examining attorney previously issued a final Office action on August 5, 2020. Upon further consideration, the examining attorney has determined that the identification of the services requires amendment.
Thus, the trademark examining attorney is raising a new nonfinal examination issue in this Office action; therefore, jurisdiction remains with the trademark examining attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.141(a); TMEP §714.05-.05(a). Filing an appeal with the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board would be considered premature at this time. See TMEP §1501. Applicant must respond to the trademark examining attorney about the issue(s) raised in this Office action.
Applicant will note the following:
IDENTIFICATION OF THE SERVICES
Wording in applicant’s proposed identification of goods and/or services that should be deleted appears in strikethrough.
Additional suggested wording appears in bolded italics. Please note that these forms of stylization are being used to provide guidance in forming an
acceptable amended identification; they should not be made part of any amendments offered by applicant in its response.
Applicant may adopt the following wording, with applicant providing the information described inside brackets, if accurate:
“Platform as a service featuring a computer software platform allowing for the design, development and storage and retrieval of products and
services in the fields of property casualty risks, catastrophic risks, weather related risks, terrorism risks, mortality and longevity risks, insurance, reinsurance, insurance portfolio management
and risk management; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable hosted computer software for [INDICATE function of
software, e.g., for filing claims, for creating actuarial tables, etc.] use in the fields of property casualty risks, catastrophic risks, weather related risks, terrorism risks,
mortality and longevity risks, insurance, reinsurance, insurance portfolio management and risk management;” in Class 42
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
For information on how to identify the goods and services in an application, applicant is encouraged to view the USPTO’s Trademark Information Network Video number 6, “Goods and services.”
LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION REFUSAL
Registration of the applied-for mark has been refused because of a likelihood of confusion with the marks in U.S. Registration Nos. 2343085 and 5192006. Trademark Act Section 2(d), 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); see TMEP §§1207.01 et seq. See the registrations previously made of record. The refusal is continued and maintained.
CLOSING
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
Do not respond via e-mail; e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. How to respond: Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Tracy Fletcher/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 115
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Direct Dial: 571-272-9471
tracy.fletcher@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE