Offc Action Outgoing

PELONIS

Midea Group Co., Ltd.

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88646745 - PELONIS - ACIP0781

To: Midea Group Co., Ltd. (twang@nilawfirm.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88646745 - PELONIS - ACIP0781
Sent: December 19, 2019 10:35:04 AM
Sent As: ecom121@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88646745

 

Mark:  PELONIS

 

 

 

 

Correspondence Address: 

TIMOTHY T. WANG

NI, WANG & MASSAND PLLC

8140 WALNUT HILL LANE, SUITE 500

DALLAS, TX 75231

 

 

 

Applicant:  Midea Group Co., Ltd.

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. ACIP0781

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

 twang@nilawfirm.com

 

 

 

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action. 

 

 

Issue date:  December 19, 2019

 

 

INTRODUCTION

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below.  15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

 

SEARCH RESULTS FROM USPTO DATABASE FOR CONFLICTING MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

 

SUMMARY OF ISSUES:

·       Identification Amendment Required

·       Multi-class Application Requirements

 

 

IDENTIFICATION AMENDMENT REQUIRED

 

Select entries in applicant's identification are indefinite because the wording is overly vague and the nature, use, or purpose of applicant's goods is unclear. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Other entries are indefinite because the wording describes goods in multiple International Classes. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Other goods are classified incorrectly and must be properly classified. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7), 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a), 1401.03(b).

 

Further, the wording “drier” in the identification of goods appears to be misspelled and is thus indefinite; the spelling must be corrected or the wording further clarified.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §1402.01(a).  Applicant may substitute the following wording for the incorrect spelling, if accurate: dryer.”

 

Suggested Wording

 

If accurate, applicant may adopt the following wording and classes:

 

Class 11: Air conditioner; electric fan air-conditioning units; air purifying apparatus and machines; air conditioning installations; electric hair dryer; drying apparatus and installations {indicate specific use, e.g., for use in heating, ventilation systems, air conditioning systems and refrigeration systems}; extractor hoods for kitchens; Dehumidifiers for household purposes; industrial dehumidifiers; Industrial humidifiers; lighting apparatus , namely, lighting installations; lamps; kettles, electric; induction cookers, namely, induction ovens; microwave ovens as cooking apparatus; cooking utensils, electric, namely, {indicate specific, electric toaster ovens, electric grills}; multicookers; cooking apparatus and installations, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., microwave ovens, cooktops}; electric rice cookers; electric cookware in the nature of roasters; Electric {indicate specific type of cookers, e.g., egg, pressure, couscous} cookers; refrigerating display cabinets; wine cellars, electric; refrigerators; refrigerating appliances and installations; heat pumps; Burners for lamps; Gas burners for {indicate use, e.g., industrial, commercial, domestic} use; fireplaces; dampers for heating, namely, control devices used in air ducts to regulate the flow of air; heating installations; bath fittings, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., bath tub jets, bath installations}; heaters for baths, namely, water heaters; solar water heaters; flushing apparatus, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., flush levers}; sanitary apparatus and installations, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., urinals being sanitary fixtures, sanitary installations in the nature of steam rooms}; drinking fountains; water purifying apparatus and machines; water filtering apparatus; disinfectant apparatus, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., apparatus for disinfecting water, disinfectant dispensers for toilets}; oil-scrubbing apparatus, namely, {indicate specific, e.g., industrial scrubbers for purifying and cleaning oils by removing harmful chemicals from oils}; disinfecting cupboard, namely, disinfecting ultraviolet lamps housed in a cupboard for disinfecting objects placed therein; radiators, electric; stoves being heating apparatus

 

Class 21: Fragrance oil burners

 

Applicant may amend the identification to clarify or limit the goods and/or services, but not to broaden or expand the goods and/or services beyond those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Generally, any deleted goods and/or services may not later be reinserted.  See TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Applicant must additionally respond to the requirement below.

 

 

MULTI-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

 

The application identifies goods in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods that are classified in at least 2 classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only 1 class(es).  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDELINES

 

Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action.  Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action.  See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.  Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05. 

 

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.    

 

 

/Justine N. Burke/

Justine N. Burke

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 121

571-270-1631

Justine.Burke@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  A response or notice of appeal must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS and ESTTA maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88646745 - PELONIS - ACIP0781

To: Midea Group Co., Ltd. (twang@nilawfirm.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88646745 - PELONIS - ACIP0781
Sent: December 19, 2019 10:35:06 AM
Sent As: ecom121@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on December 19, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88646745

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/Justine N. Burke/

Justine N. Burke

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 121

571-270-1631

Justine.Burke@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from December 19, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed