To: | Alveo Technologies, Inc. (efiling@knobbe.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88627519 - ALVEO - ALVEO.030T |
Sent: | October 31, 2019 12:47:35 PM |
Sent As: | ecom107@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88627519
Mark: ALVEO
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Alveo Technologies, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. ALVEO.030T
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 31, 2019
No Conflicting Marks Noted
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Identification of Goods – Amendments Required
The entire identification of goods is indefinite, too broad, and must be clarified because it could include goods in other international classes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In particular, the current identification could encompass nucleic acid sequences and chemical reagents for medical purposes in International Class 5. In the identification of goods, applicant must use the common commercial or generic names for the goods, be as complete and specific as possible, and avoid the use of indefinite words and phrases. TMEP §1402.03(a); see 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6). If applicant uses indefinite words such as “apparatus,” “components,” or “devices,” such wording must be followed by “namely,” and a list of each specific product identified by its common commercial or generic name. See TMEP §§1401.05(d), 1402.03(a).
Applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate: blood glucose meters; ultrasonic medical diagnostic apparatus; medical diagnostic apparatus for testing DNA and RNA samples.
For assistance with finding other acceptable identifications of medical devices and apparatus, see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Translation
Inaccurate Description – Amendment Required
The following description is suggested, if accurate: The mark consists of 4 solid circles forming a diamond pattern and the stylized word “ALVEO”.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Michael Engel/
Trademark Examining Attorney
Law Office 107
Michael.Engel@uspto.gov
(571) 272-9338
RESPONSE GUIDANCE