Notation to File

SAMSUNG

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd

RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG   Ms. Shinn –   The statement is acceptable and may be entered via an Examiner’s Amendment.  Thank you.     Daniel I. Schloss Greenberg Traurig, LLP | MetLife Building | 200 Park Avenue, 38th Floor | New York, NY 10166 Tel 212.801.2256 | Fax 212.805.5571 SchlossD@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com         From: Shinn, Lauren [mailto:Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.GOV] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:32 PM To: Schloss, Daniel I. (OfCnsl-NY-WCO-IP-Tech) <SchlossD@gtlaw.com>; Bianco, Christopher (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <BIANCOC@gtlaw.com>; Akers, Beth (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <akersb@gtlaw.com>; NYTMDKT <NYTMDKT@gtlaw.com> Subject: RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG   My apologies, the statement should say: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the European Union as of the date of issuance of the foreign re

NOTE TO THE FILE


SERIAL NUMBER:            88622409

DATE:                                12/18/2019

NAME:                               lshinn

NOTE:         

Searched:                                                             
     Google                            
     Lexis/Nexis                       
     OneLook
     Wikipedia
     Acronym Finder                         Protest evidence reviewed
     Other:

Checked:                                                             
     Geographic significance          
     Surname                          
     Translation
     ID with ID/CLASS mailbox

     Checked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

     Requested Law Library search       X   Issued Examiner’s Amendment
     for:                                   and entered changes in TRADEUPS

        PRINT        DO NOT PRINT           Added design code in TRADEUPS
     Description of the mark
     Translation statement                  Re-imaged standard character
                                            drawing
     Negative translation statement             
     Consent of living individual           Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
                                            about misclassified definite ID
     Changed TRADEUPS to:

     OTHER:

 

 

From: SchlossD@gtlaw.com <SchlossD@gtlaw.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 4:11 PM
To: Shinn, Lauren <Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.GOV>; BIANCOC@gtlaw.com; akersb@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG

 

Ms. Shinn –

 

The statement is acceptable and may be entered via an Examiner’s Amendment.  Thank you.

 

 

Daniel I. Schloss
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | MetLife Building | 200 Park Avenue, 38th Floor | New York, NY 10166
Tel 212.801.2256 | Fax 212.805.5571

SchlossD@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com

 

 

 

 

From: Shinn, Lauren [mailto:Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:32 PM
To: Schloss, Daniel I. (OfCnsl-NY-WCO-IP-Tech) <
SchlossD@gtlaw.com>; Bianco, Christopher (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <BIANCOC@gtlaw.com>; Akers, Beth (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <akersb@gtlaw.com>; NYTMDKT <NYTMDKT@gtlaw.com>
Subject: RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG

 

My apologies, the statement should say: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in the European Union as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.”

 

From: Shinn, Lauren
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:30 PM
To:
SchlossD@gtlaw.com; BIANCOC@gtlaw.com; akersb@gtlaw.com; NYTMDKT@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG

 

Dear Mr. Schloss,

 

Thank you for your quick reply.

 

I also noticed that the application has a Section 44(e) basis with an EUIPO registration. Because the applicant is domiciled in the Republic of Korea (and thus a country different from the country that issued the foreign registration), the applicant must establish that, as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration, the country that issued the foreign registration is also applicant’s country of origin. See 15 U.S.C. §1126(c); TMEP §1002.04.

 

To overcome this refusal, applicant may provide the following written statement for the record: “Applicant has had a bona fide and effective industrial or commercial establishment in Europe as of the date of issuance of the foreign registration.”

 

Kindly let me know whether I may enter the above statement for the record by Examiner’s Amendment.

 

Thank you,

Lauren

 

 

From: SchlossD@gtlaw.com <SchlossD@gtlaw.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 3:01 PM
To: Shinn, Lauren <
Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.GOV>; BIANCOC@gtlaw.com; akersb@gtlaw.com; NYTMDKT@gtlaw.com
Subject: RE: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG

 

Ms. Shinn –

 

New York does not have bar numbers.  See below from : http://ww2.nycourts.gov/attorneys/registration/faqs.shtml :

 

What is my New York Bar number?

Many states have Bar numbers; New York does not. The registration number, which appears on the biennial registration form, is used for internal Office of Court Administration record-keeping only. 

 

 

Daniel I. Schloss
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | MetLife Building | 200 Park Avenue, 38th Floor | New York, NY 10166
Tel 212.801.2256 | Fax 212.805.5571

SchlossD@gtlaw.com | www.gtlaw.com

 

 

 

From: Shinn, Lauren [mailto:Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.GOV]
Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 2:58 PM
To: Schloss, Daniel I. (OfCnsl-NY-WCO-IP-Tech) <
SchlossD@gtlaw.com>; Bianco, Christopher (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <BIANCOC@gtlaw.com>; Akers, Beth (BStf-NY-IP-Tech) <akersb@gtlaw.com>; NYTMDKT <NYTMDKT@gtlaw.com>
Subject: USPTO Trademark Application Ser. No. 88622409 SAMSUNG

 

*EXTERNAL TO GT*

Dear Mr. Schloss,

 

I am the trademark examining attorney assigned to the above-cited case.

 

In reviewing the application, I noticed that you listed “N/A” as your attorney bar membership number. However, upon review of the New York State Unified Court System, it appears that your attorney bar membership number might be ********.

 

Could you (or any other attorney working on this matter) please confirm whether “********” is your attorney bar membership number? And if it is, may I also have permission to add this to the record via Examiner’s Amendment?

 

Thank you,

Lauren

 

Lauren D. Shinn

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 128

(571) 270-5230

Lauren.Shinn@USPTO.gov

 


If you are not an intended recipient of confidential and privileged information in this email, please delete it, notify us immediately at postmaster@gtlaw.com, and do not use or disseminate the information.


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed