Notation to File

NOTE TO THE FILE

---

SERIAL NUMBER:            88618323

DATE:                                01/15/2020

NAME:                               cdetmer1

NOTE:         

Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
        phone                               Left message with
    X   email                               Attorney/Applicant

 X   Changed TRADEUPS to: Amend ID.

From: Danielle Bieniek <danibeeco@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2020 4:42 PM
To: Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: Re: 88618323 DB USPTO Required Application Amendment

 

Carolyn,

 

Thank you for the clarification. I believe class 026 with the descriptions you listed below is on point with what I need. I’d like to change my filing by removing class 014 and filing for 026 with the descriptions you listed below and adding, “hexagonal purse charms with embroidery”

 

Danielle 

 

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:21 PM Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@uspto.gov> wrote:

Danielle,

 

You are correct that purse charms are correctly classified in class 026. I cannot give you legal advice about what makes the most sense for you, but you can certainly amend your identification of goods to cover class 026 goods that are within the scope of your original identification of goods. I have copied my suggested class 026 identification here for your reference:

Class 026: hexagonal purse charms; colorful charms for handbag chains; Tassels for handbags with multi-colored embroidery; bee shaped purse charm; purse charms

You can also add a class if you wish. Please let me know at your earliest convenience how you wish to proceed regarding your identification of goods.

 

Best,

Carolyn

 

Carolyn Detmer

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 127

(571) 272-2722

carolyn.detmer1@uspto.gov

 

Please note that although all relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record, this email communication does not constitute a formal response to an office action. Although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the application, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.

 

 

 

From: Danielle Bieniek <danibeeco@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 2:16 PM
To: Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: Re: 88618323 DB USPTO Required Application Amendment

 

Hi Carolyn, 

 

The charms I am making will be for purses and handbags, because of this, would it make more sense to file under class 026? From what I’m reading it says that charms that are to be affixed to items other than actual jewelry (eg. backpacks) should be classified with 026. 

 

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:58 AM Detmer, Carolyn <Carolyn.Detmer1@uspto.gov> wrote:

Danielle,

 

Thank you for your response. As I was reviewing my suggested class 014 id one last time, I see that I included “adornments for handbags with multi-colored embroidery”, which is not acceptable because the nature of the “adornments” is not clear. To keep this in class 014, I would need for you to specify they type of handbag adornments that you intend to sell that fall into class 014. I would suggest using our ID Manual to check any items you may wish to claim here: http://idm-tmng.gov.uspto.report/id-master-list-public.html. Otherwise, we can also remove this clause from the identification of goods in class 014.

 

I apologize for the mistake in the ID I suggested in my email. Please reach out with any questions. I will need to hear from you again to avoid issuing a final action.

 

Best,

Carolyn

 

         Sent to TICRS as Serial Number: 88618323