To: | Shield Corporation Limited (psdocketing@pattersonsheridan.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88593826 - SHIELD - ABEL/T002US |
Sent: | December 09, 2019 08:44:58 PM |
Sent As: | ecom114@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88593826
Mark: SHIELD
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Shield Corporation Limited
|
|
Reference/Docket No. ABEL/T002US
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
PRIORITY ACTION
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: December 09, 2019
Applicant must address issues shown below. On December 9, 2019, the examining attorney and Puja Detjen discussed the issues below. Applicant must timely respond to these issues. See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.
ADVISORY IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS
As discussed with the attorney of record, a minor typological error in the punctuation is resolved.
IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS
The identification of goods is indefinite and must be clarified. See TMEP §1402.01. Specifically applicant must address issues with the following wording:
Applicant may adopt the following identification, if accurate:
Class 9: Optical lens sights for firearms, namely, optical red-dot sights
Class 13: Firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching ancillary equipment in the form of sights to a firearm
Class 35: Retail store services in the field of optical lens sights for firearms, namely, optical red-dot sights, and firearm attachments, namely, mounts for attaching ancillary equipment in the form of sights to a firearm
An applicant may only amend an identification to clarify or limit the goods, but not to add to or broaden the scope of the goods. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); see TMEP §§1402.06 et seq., 1402.07.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS
Therefore, applicant must either (1) restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid, or (2) submit the fees for each additional class.
The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Plus application is $225 per class. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iv), 2.22(a)(10); TMEP §§819.03, 819.04. See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS Plus fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee by regular TEAS.
The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a); TMEP §820.03. See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee by regular TEAS.
If the additional specimen is identical to the specimen submitted with the application, and the application was properly verified, the verified statement is not necessary. Further, if a single specimen supports multiple classes, applicant should indicate which classes the specimen supports rather than providing multiple copies of the same specimen. TMEP §§904.01(b), 1403.01; see 37 C.F.R. §2.59(a).
ADVISORY - PRIOR-FILED APPLICATIONS
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the marks in the referenced applications. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/David A. Brookshire/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 114
(571) 272-7991
David.Brookshire@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE