To: | SHENZHEN RELX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. (firm@rabinberdo.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88533344 - RELX DESIGN - VER-200TM |
Sent: | October 23, 2019 10:53:45 AM |
Sent As: | ecom107@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88533344
Mark: RELX DESIGN
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: SHENZHEN RELX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. VER-200TM
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT
Issue date: October 23, 2019
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Application has been amended as shown below. As agreed to by Hui Zhang, Esq. on October 23, 2019, the examining attorney has amended the application as shown below. Please notify the examining attorney immediately of any objections. TMEP §707. Otherwise, no response is required. Id. In addition, applicant is advised that amendments to the goods and/or services are permitted only if they clarify or limit them; amendments that add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a).
The following disclaimer statement is added to the record:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “DESIGN” apart from the mark as shown.
See 15 U.S.C. §1056(a); TMEP §§1213, 1213.08(a)(i).
If applicant has questions regarding this Office action, please telephone or e-mail the assigned trademark examining attorney. All relevant e-mail communications will be placed in the official application record; however, an e-mail communication will not be accepted as a response to this Office action and will not extend the deadline for filing a proper response. See 37 C.F.R. §2.191; TMEP §§709.04-.05. Further, although the trademark examining attorney may provide additional explanation pertaining to the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action, the trademark examining attorney may not provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
Jimmy Stein
/jws/
Jimmy Stein
Examining Attorney
United States Patent and Trademark Office
james.stein@uspto.gov
571-272-3056