To: | Youngone Corporation (USTM.docketing@seedip.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88520336 - ECOLOFT - 980106.218 |
Sent: | October 07, 2019 07:19:19 PM |
Sent As: | ecom103@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88520336
Mark: ECOLOFT
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Youngone Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 980106.218
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 07, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Applicant must respond to the requirement(s) set forth below.
IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF GOODS
The wording “apparel accessories” in the identification of goods for International Class 25 must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. In particular, this wording could encompass jewelry in Class 14, handbags in Class 18, and headwear and footwear in Class 25, among others. Applicant must amend this wording to specify the common commercial or generic name of the goods, and ensure that the goods are appropriately classified. See TMEP §1402.01.
Applicant may substitute the following wording, if accurate:
Class 20: Pillows
Class 24: Bedding, namely, bed sheets; bed coverings; quilts; duvets
Class 25: Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, coats, dresses; apparel accessories, namely, headwear and footwear; hats;
gloves (clothing); scarves; mittens; shoes; boots; jackets (clothing); vests; parkas; shirts; shirt jacs, namely, jackets that have the appearance of shirts;
pants; capes; ponchos
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
MULTIPLE CLASS APPLICATION ADVISORY
(1) List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.
(2) Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least three classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only two class(es). Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.
See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).
See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.
COLOR CLAIM AND MARK DESCRIPTION
To clarify whether color is claimed as a feature of the mark, applicant may satisfy one of the following:
(1) If color is not a feature of the mark, applicant must submit a statement (a) that color is not a feature of the mark and request that the color claim be deleted from the application, and (b) describing the literal and design elements in the mark that omits any reference to color. See 37 C.F.R. §2.37; TMEP §§808.01, 808.02. In this case, applicant may delete the color claim because it would not materially alter the mark. See 37 C.F.R. §2.72; TMEP §807.14. However, any other amendments will not be accepted if they would materially alter the mark. 37 C.F.R. §2.72; see TMEP §§807.07(e), 807.14 et seq.
The following description is suggested, if accurate:
The mark consists of the stylized wording “ECOLOFT”.
(2) If color is a feature of the mark, applicant must submit describe the literal and design elements in the mark that specifies where the colors appear in those elements. 37 C.F.R. §§2.37, 2.52(b)(1); see TMEP §807.07(a)-(a)(ii). The following description is suggested, if accurate:
Description: “The mark consists of the stylized wording “ECOLOFT” where “ECO” appears in black and “LOFT” appears in gray.”
TMEP §807.07(e).
For more information about drawings and instructions on how to submit a new drawing and a color claim and/or description online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, see the Drawing webpage.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although the trademark examining attorney cannot provide legal advice or statements about applicant’s rights, the trademark examining attorney can provide applicant with additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. Although the USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions, emails can be used for informal communications and will be included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Laura Golden/
/Laura Golden/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
(571) 272-3928
laura.golden@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE