To: | Zuffa, LLC (TRADEMARKSLV@DICKINSONWRIGHT.COM) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88494369 - UFC PERFORMANCE INSTITUTE - 066108-72328 |
Sent: | March 05, 2020 03:23:18 PM |
Sent As: | ecom107@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 Attachment - 8 Attachment - 9 Attachment - 10 Attachment - 11 Attachment - 12 Attachment - 13 Attachment - 14 Attachment - 15 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88494369
Mark: UFC PERFORMANCE INSTITUTE
|
|
Correspondence Address: Jennifer Ko Craft; Michael N. Feder; Joh 8363 West Sunset Road, Suite 200
|
|
Applicant: Zuffa, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 066108-72328
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
FINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: March 05, 2020
This Office action is in response to applicant’s communication filed on 2/19/20.
The trademark examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in the summary of issues below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.63(b); TMEP §714.04.
SUMMARY OF ISSUES MADE FINAL that applicant must address:
DISCLAIMER REQUIRED – Final Refusal
It has been repeatedly held that words or abbreviations in a trade name designating the legal character of an entity (e.g., Corporation, Corp., Co., Inc., Ltd., etc.) or the familial business structure of an entity (e.g., "& Sons" or "Bros.") must be disclaimed because an entity designation has no source-indicating capacity. See In re Piano Factory Grp., Inc., 85 USPQ2d 1522 (TTAB 2006) (holding VOSE & SONS primarily merely a surname); In re Taylor & Francis [Publishers] Inc., 55 USPQ2d 1213, 1215 (TTAB 2000) (finding "PRESS," as applied to a printing or publishing establishment, "is in the nature of a generic entity designation which is incapable of serving a source-indicating function"); In re The Paint Prods. Co., 8 USPQ2d 1863, 1866 (TTAB 1988) ("’PAINT PRODUCTS CO.’ is no more registrable for goods emanating from a company that sells paint products than it would be as a service mark for the retail paint store services offered by such a company").
It is maintained that the word “INSTITUTE” should be treated in the same manner as the words “PRESS” or “PAINT PRODUCTS CO.,” as outlined above. The word “INSTITUTE” is functioning in the proposed mark to merely indicate a type of establishment. The fact that applicant, as an institute, provides goods (as opposed to services) does not obviate a finding of descriptiveness. Many “institutes” offer exercise mats, as shown by the attached third-party websites, particularly those that are organized for the purpose of providing exercise or fitness materials and/or services. See, e.g.:
Integral Yoga Institute
Himalayan Institute
Somatic Systems Institute
Perform Better Functional Training Institute
It is well settled that each case must be decided on its own facts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board is not bound by prior decisions involving different records. See In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 1342, 57 USPQ2d 1564, 1566 (Fed. Cir. 2001); In re Datapipe, Inc., 111 USPQ2d 1330, 1336 (TTAB 2014); TMEP §1209.03(a). The question of whether a mark is merely descriptive is determined based on the evidence of record at the time each registration is sought. In re Virtual Indep. Paralegals, LLC, 2019 USPQ2d 111512, at *9 (TTAB 2019) (citing In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d at 1342, 57 USPQ2d at 1566); TMEP §1209.03(a).
Therefore, based on the entirety of arguments and evidence presented, the requirement for a disclaimer is maintained and made final.
Applicant may respond to this issue by submitting a disclaimer in the following format:
No claim is made to the exclusive right to use “INSTITUTE” apart from the mark as shown.
For an overview of disclaimers and instructions on how to provide one using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), see the Disclaimer webpage.
How to respond. Click to file a request for reconsideration of this final Office action that fully resolves all outstanding requirements and refusals and/or click to file a timely appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) with the required filing fee(s).
/med/
Michelle E. Dubois
Trademark Attorney
USPTO, Law Office 107
(571) 272-5887
michelle.dubois@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE