Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88492433 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 106 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88492433/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | EPLEX |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
OWNER SECTION (current) | |
NAME | GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. |
STREET | 5964 La Place Court |
CITY | Carlsbad |
STATE | California |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 92008 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
OWNER SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. |
STREET | 5964 La Place Court |
CITY | Carlsbad |
STATE | California |
ZIP/POSTAL CODE | 92008 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
GenMarkIP@genmarkdx.com | |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
In response to the Office Action dated September 23, 2019, Applicant respectfully submits the following response. Amendment of the Description of Goods Applicant respectfully requests the description of goods for the EPLEX application in Class 5 be amended to the following: Chemical preparations and substances for medical purposes, namely chemical preparations for testing blood, bodily fluids, and excrements for medical purposes; none of the foregoing related to testing estrogen conditions. Section 2(d) Refusal Applicant respectfully submits that the refusal based upon a likelihood of confusion with U.S. Registration No. 5,470,779 for the mark E-PLEXX (the ‘779 Registration) should be withdrawn for the following reasons. Applicant owns several registrations for the EPLEX mark that were registered on July 11, 2017 for goods related to those at issue here, well-before the May 15, 2018 registration date of the ‘779 Registration. Declaration of Justine K. Wong, ¶ 2 (“Wong Declaration”). In addition, as shown in Exhibit A of the Wong Declaration, Applicant’s EPLEX mark was first used in commerce in October of 2015, well before the Registrant’s first use date of July 27, 2017 for the mark within the ‘779 Registration. The two marks have coexisted on the Principal Register and within the marketplace for about two years. Further, given the narrower goods registered under the ‘779 Registration (i.e. nutritional supplements containing estrogen compounds), along with Applicant’s more narrowly amended goods for testing blood, bodily fluids, and excrements, and excluding testing of estrogen conditions, Applicant asserts that the Examiner’s concerns have been addressed. Conclusion Based on the foregoing, Applicant respectfully requests the Examiner withdraw the refusal and allow this application to proceed to publication. |
|
EVIDENCE SECTION | |
EVIDENCE FILE NAME(S) | |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_701641162-20200323141455791551_._ARK_-_Declaration_of_JKW_ISO_of_EPLEX_Office_Action_Response.pdf |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (1 page) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT18\884\924\88492433\xml1\ROA0002.JPG |
ORIGINAL PDF FILE | evi_701641162-20200323141455791551_._A_for_Declaration_of_JKW_ISO_of_EPLEX_Office_Action_Response.PDF |
CONVERTED PDF FILE(S) (3 pages) |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT18\884\924\88492433\xml1\ROA0003.JPG |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT18\884\924\88492433\xml1\ROA0004.JPG | |
\\TICRS\EXPORT18\IMAGEOUT18\884\924\88492433\xml1\ROA0005.JPG | |
DESCRIPTION OF EVIDENCE FILE | 1. Declaration of Justine K. Wong in support of the response to Office Action; 2. Exhibit to Declaration of Justine K. Wong. |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (001) (no change) | |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (005) (current) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 005 |
DESCRIPTION | Chemical preparations and substances for medical purposes |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
GOODS AND/OR SERVICES SECTION (005) (proposed) | |
INTERNATIONAL CLASS | 005 |
TRACKED TEXT DESCRIPTION | |
FINAL DESCRIPTION | |
Chemical preparations and substances for medical purposes, namely chemical preparations for testing blood, bodily fluids, and excrements for medical purposes; none of the foregoing related to testing estrogen conditions. | |
FILING BASIS | Section 1(b) |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP |
STREET | 401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 2600 |
CITY | SAN DIEGO |
STATE | California |
POSTAL CODE | 92101 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 619-236-1551 |
FAX | 619-696-1410 |
trademarks@higgslaw.com | |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 111100-00038 |
ATTORNEY INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP |
STREET | 401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 2600 |
CITY | SAN DIEGO |
STATE | California |
POSTAL CODE | 92101 |
COUNTRY/REGION/JURISDICTION/U.S. TERRITORY | United States |
PHONE | 619-236-1551 |
FAX | 619-696-1410 |
trademarks@higgslaw.com | |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 111100-00038 |
OTHER APPOINTED ATTORNEY | Justine K. Wong, James Cekola |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (current) | |
NAME | CHARLES F. REIDELBACH, JR. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | trademarks@higgslaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | NOT PROVIDED |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 111100-00038 |
CORRESPONDENCE INFORMATION (proposed) | |
NAME | Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. |
PRIMARY EMAIL ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE | trademarks@higgslaw.com |
SECONDARY EMAIL ADDRESS(ES) (COURTESY COPIES) | NOT PROVIDED |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 111100-00038 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /charlesfreidelbachjr/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr. |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, California Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 619-236-1551 |
DATE SIGNED | 03/23/2020 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Mon Mar 23 19:05:41 ET 2020 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XX.XXX.XXX.X-20 200323190541542541-884924 33-710afc1d3297bbb49d48f4 14bc832fb2598c7bdabf7c435 eaf5d171cece16272f-N/A-N/ A-20200323162023393309 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
In response to the Office Action dated September 23, 2019, Applicant respectfully submits the following response.
Amendment of the Description of Goods
Applicant respectfully requests the description of goods for the EPLEX application in Class 5 be amended to the following:
Chemical preparations and substances for medical purposes, namely chemical preparations for testing blood, bodily fluids, and excrements for medical purposes; none of the foregoing related to testing estrogen conditions.
Section 2(d) Refusal
Applicant respectfully submits that the refusal based upon a likelihood of confusion with U.S. Registration No. 5,470,779 for the mark E-PLEXX (the ‘779 Registration) should be withdrawn for the following reasons. Applicant owns several registrations for the EPLEX mark that were registered on July 11, 2017 for goods related to those at issue here, well-before the May 15, 2018 registration date of the ‘779 Registration. Declaration of Justine K. Wong, ¶ 2 (“Wong Declaration”). In addition, as shown in Exhibit A of the Wong Declaration, Applicant’s EPLEX mark was first used in commerce in October of 2015, well before the Registrant’s first use date of July 27, 2017 for the mark within the ‘779 Registration. The two marks have coexisted on the Principal Register and within the marketplace for about two years. Further, given the narrower goods registered under the ‘779 Registration (i.e. nutritional supplements containing estrogen compounds), along with Applicant’s more narrowly amended goods for testing blood, bodily fluids, and excrements, and excluding testing of estrogen conditions, Applicant asserts that the Examiner’s concerns have been addressed.
Conclusion
Based on the foregoing, Applicant respectfully requests the Examiner withdraw the refusal and allow this application to proceed to publication.