To: | Swisher International, Inc. (info@lmiplaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88477745 - LEAF - SW-577-TM |
Sent: | October 31, 2019 01:37:56 PM |
Sent As: | ecom104@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88477745
Mark: LEAF
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Swisher International, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. SW-577-TM
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) and/or Electronic System for Trademark Trials and Appeals (ESTTA). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form and/or to ESTTA for an appeal appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 31, 2019
This Office acknowledges receipt of applicant’s communication dated September 27, 2019, in which applicant disclaimed the word LEAF in response to the merely descriptive refusal.
The examining attorney maintains and now makes FINAL the following refusal:
Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Merely Descriptive
As the evidence attached to the initial Office action from http://www.ahdictionary.com/word/search.html?q=leaf shows, the applicant’s proposed mark means “[t]he leaves of a plant used or processed for a specific purpose.” See also the attached evidence from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/leaf (“the leaves of a plant as an article of commerce”); http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cigar (“[a]” cigar is a rolled bundle of dried and fermented tobacco leaves made to be smoked.”); http://www.leafonly.com/cigar-tobacco-leaf (roll your own cigars); http://www.cigaraficionado.com/glossary/homogenized-tobacco-leaf, and http://www.wholeaf.com/wholesale-tobacco/tobacco-leaves/cigar-tobacco-filler-leaf/. Given that the identified goods are cigars, the proposed mark merely describes an ingredient, characteristic, or feature of applicant’s goods.
Accordingly, applicant’s application for registration of the proposed mark on the Principal Register is refused under Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1).
In an effort to overcome this refusal, applicant disclaimed the only word -- LEAF -- in this word mark, arguing unpersuasively that the applied-for mark is highly stylized in its entirety and that the stylization is enough to overcome the refusal. However, “[a]n entire mark may not be disclaimed. If a mark is not registrable as a whole, a disclaimer will not make it registrable. There must be something in the combination of elements in the mark, or something of sufficient substance or distinctiveness over and above the matter being disclaimed, that would make the composite registrable. See In re Sadoru Group, Ltd., 105 USPQ2d 1484 (TTAB 2012) (finding the stylization of SADORU does not create a separate and inherently distinctive commercial impression apart from the word itself); In re Carlson, 91 USPQ2d 1198, 1203 (TTAB 2009); In re Anchor Hocking Corp., 223 USPQ 85, 86 (TTAB 1984) (citing In re Carolyn’s Candies, Inc., 206 USPQ 356, 360 (TTAB 1980)); Ex parte Ste. Pierre Smirnoff Fls, Inc., 102 USPQ 415, 416 (Comm’r Pats. 1954).” TMEP 1213.06. Here the stylization of LEAF does not create a separate and inherently distinctive commercial impression apart from the word itself.
Although applicant’s mark has been refused registration, applicant may respond to the refusal by submitting evidence and arguments in support of registration.
SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER (ADVISORY)
If applicant files an acceptable allegation of use and also amends to the Supplemental Register, the application effective filing date will be the date applicant met the minimum filing requirements under 37 C.F.R. §2.76(c) for an amendment to allege use. TMEP §§816.02, 1102.03; see 37 C.F.R. §2.75(b). In addition, the undersigned trademark examining attorney will conduct a new search of the USPTO records for conflicting marks based on the later application filing date. TMEP §§206.01, 1102.03.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this final Office action and/or appeal it to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB)
Johnson, Don
/Donald O. Johnson/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 104
571-272-7831
don.johnson@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE