To: | Stenger Brian (info@gator-gripp.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88451804 - GATOR GRIPP - N/A |
Sent: | October 09, 2019 06:37:45 PM |
Sent As: | ecom116@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88451804
Mark: GATOR GRIPP
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: Stenger Brian
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: October 09, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue(s) below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
APPLICANT’S NAME AND ENTITY
If these individuals are applying together as joint owners/applicants, they must amend the legal entity from “limited liability company” to “individual” and each joint applicant must indicate his or her country of citizenship. See TMEP §803.03(d). Alternatively, if applicant is a limited liability company, applicant must set forth its correct name and U.S. state or foreign country under whose laws it was established. TMEP §803.03(h).
If, in response to the above request, applicant provides information indicating that it is not the owner of the mark, registration will be refused because the application was void as filed. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §§803.06, 1201.02(b). An application must be filed by the party who owns or is entitled to use the mark as of the application filing date. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(d); TMEP §1201.02(b).
44(d) FILING BASIS
The applicant claimed a priority filing date under 44(d) however the applicant did not provide the foreign application number, country where the application was filed or the date of filing. To claim priority under Trademark Act Section 44(d), an applicant must provide the following: (1) a “claim of priority” filed within six months of the foreign application filing date (2) the filing date, serial number, and country of the first regularly-filed foreign application, or a statement that “the application is based upon a subsequently regularly-filed application in the same foreign country, and any prior-filed application has been withdrawn, abandoned, or otherwise disposed of, without having been laid open to public inspection and without having any rights outstanding, and has not served as a basis for claiming a right of priority;” (3) a list of goods and/or services that does not exceed the scope of the goods and/or services in the foreign application; and (4) the following statement, verified with an affidavit or signed declaration under 37 C.F.R. §2.20: “Applicant has a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce and had a bona fide intention to use the mark in commerce as of the application filing date.” See TMEP §1003.
Further, applicant’s country of origin and the country where the foreign application is filed must be a party to an international treaty or agreement with the United States that provides a right of priority, or extends reciprocal rights to priority to U.S. nationals. TMEP §1003.
For more information about Section 44(d) basis requirements, and instructions on how to satisfy them online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form, please go to the Basis webpage.
The applicant may delete the 44(d) filing basis and just rely on the 1(a) use in commerce basis if accurate.
RESPONSE
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
/Jennifer M. Martin/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 116
(571) 272-9193
Jennifer.Martin@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE