To: | talluto, marco (marco.talluto@yahoo.it) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88445740 - WIKI - N/A |
Sent: | August 16, 2019 04:13:24 PM |
Sent As: | ecom121@uspto.gov |
Attachments: | Attachment - 1 Attachment - 2 Attachment - 3 Attachment - 4 Attachment - 5 Attachment - 6 Attachment - 7 |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88445740
Mark: WIKI
|
|
Correspondence Address:
|
|
Applicant: talluto, marco
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: August 16, 2019
The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney. Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issues below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.
· Mark Not Entitled to Register – Prior–filed Application Pending
· Information about Applicant’s Domicile Required
· U.S. Counsel Required
MARK NOT ENTITLED TO REGISTER – PRIOR-FILED APPLICATION PENDING
The trademark examining attorney has searched the USPTO’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no similar registered marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d). However, a mark in a prior-filed pending application may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark.
In response to this Office action, applicant may present arguments in support of registration by addressing the issue of the potential conflict between applicant’s mark and the mark in the referenced application. Applicant’s election not to submit arguments at this time in no way limits applicant’s right to address this issue later if a refusal under Section 2(d) issues.
If applicant responds to the potential refusal, applicant must also respond to the requirements set forth below.
INFORMATION ABOUT APPLICANT’S DOMICILE REQUIRED
An applicant’s domicile address is an application requirement and also dictates whether an applicant is required to have an attorney who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the highest court of a U.S. state or territory represent them at the USPTO. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.11(a), 2.22(a)(1), 2.32(a)(2), 2.189. An applicant whose permanent legal residence or principal place of business is not within the United States or its territories must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o)-(p), 2.11(a). Foreign citizens must comply with U.S. visa immigration laws to claim the United States as their permanent legal residence.
In this case, it is unclear from the application record whether the U.S. street address provided is actually the address of applicant’s permanent legal residence. Applicant must therefore provide all of the following:
(1) An explanation of the basis for claiming that the United States address provided in the “Owner Information” section of the application is applicant’s lawful permanent residence (if an individual) or business headquarters (if a juristic entity).
(2) Documentation showing that the address in the application is applicant’s address of residence (for an individual) or business headquarters (for a juristic entity), such as:
(i) a valid signed rental, lease, or mortgage agreement dated within one year of the application filing date;
(ii) a valid homeowner’s, renter’s, or motor vehicle insurance policy dated within one year of the application filing date;
(iii) a computer generated bill issued by a utility company dated within 60 days of the application filing date; or
(iv) change-of-address confirmation from the U.S. Postal Service showing applicant’s prior and current address (Form CNL107).
Submitted documentation must show the name and address of the residence or business and the date of the document but should redact other personal and financial information.
Requirement of U.S. Licensed Attorney for Foreign Trademark Applicants & Registrants, Examination Guide 4-19, at I.A.3 (Aug. 2019); see 37 C.F.R. §§2.11(b), 2.61(b), 2.189.
If the U.S. street address of record is not applicant’s correct or current domicile address, applicant must provide his or her correct and current permanent legal place of residence address. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.11(b), 2.61(b), 2.189. If applicant provides a different U.S. street address as his or her domicile address, applicant must provide the same information and documentation requested above.
Failure to comply with this request for information is grounds for refusing registration. In re Harley, 119 USPQ2d 1755, 1757-58 (TTAB 2016); TMEP §814. Applicant also is advised that providing false statements or documentation concerning applicant’s domicile address or in response to this request for information is deemed submitting a paper for an improper purpose in violation of 37 C.F.R. §11.18(b), and subject to the sanctions and actions provided in 37 C.F.R. §11.18(c). See 37 C.F.R. §2.11(e).
To provide the explanatory statement and documentation supporting applicant’s domicile. Open the correct TEAS response form and enter the serial number, answer “yes” to wizard question #3, and on the “Additional Statement(s)” page in the “Miscellaneous Statement” field (1) provide in the text box a statement explaining the basis for applicant’s claim that the listed address is applicant’s physical domicile address; and (2) click the button below the text box to attach evidence showing the U.S. address is applicant’s domicile.
If the listed address is not applicant’s correct or current domicile, provide applicant’s physical domicile address by opening the correct TEAS response form, answering “yes” to wizard question #5, and providing applicant’s physical domicile address on the “Owner Information” page. If applicant provides a different U.S. street address, applicant will need to follow the directions for providing the additional information and documentation requested above.
U.S. COUNSEL REQUIRED
Applicant must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney because it is not clear that applicant’s current address supports domicile in the United States. Applicants domiciled outside the United States must be represented by a U.S.-licensed attorney at the USPTO. 37 C.F.R. §2.11(a). This application will not proceed to registration without such appointment and representation. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.2(o), 2.11(a). See Hiring a U.S.-licensed trademark attorney for more information. If applicant can establish domicile in the United States, this requirement may be withdrawn.
To appoint or designate a U.S.-licensed attorney. To appoint an attorney, applicant should (1) submit a completed Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) Revocation, Appointment, and/or Change of Address of Attorney/Domestic Representative form and (2) promptly notify the trademark examining attorney that this TEAS form was submitted. Alternatively, if applicant has already retained an attorney, the attorney can respond to this Office action by using the appropriate TEAS response form and provide his or her attorney information in the form and sign it as applicant’s attorney. See 37 C.F.R. §2.17(b)(1)(ii).
HOW TO RESPOND
Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
/Hannah Gilbert/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
(571) 272-5029
hannah.gilbert@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE