To: | Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC (trademarks@motorola.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88421131 - ROKR - N/A |
Sent: | July 24, 2019 03:02:51 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88421131
Mark: ROKR
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC
|
|
Reference/Docket No. N/A
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: July 24, 2019
TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820. TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action
The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).
Identification of Goods
The examining attorney suggests the following.
Mobile phones, smartphones and accessories therefor, namely, battery chargers and power adapters; wireless headsets and headsets for use with mobile phones; audio speakers; stereo speakers; wireless speakers; soundbar speakers; loud speakers; subwoofers; stands adapted for stereos and audio speakers; audio receivers; stereo receivers; audio amplifiers; stereo amplifiers; stereo tuners; turntables being record players and record player parts; remote controls for stereo receivers, stereo amplifiers and stereo tuners; audio and stereo cables and connectors in International Class 9.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
Partial Abandonment Advisory
If applicant does not respond to this Office action within the six-month period for response, the following goods and/or services in International Class(es) 9 will be deleted from the application: headsets. The application will then proceed with the following goods and/or services in International Class(es) 9 only: Mobile phones, smartphones and accessories therefor, namely, battery chargers and power adapters; audio speakers; stereo speakers; wireless speakers; soundbar speakers; loud speakers; subwoofers; stands adapted for stereos and audio speakers; audio receivers; stereo receivers; audio amplifiers; stereo amplifiers; stereo tuners; turntables being record players and record player parts; remote controls for stereo receivers, stereo amplifiers and stereo tuners; audio and stereo cables and connectors. See 37 C.F.R. §2.65(a)-(a)(1); TMEP §718.02(a).
Response Guidelines
For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action. For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above. For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.
/Dawn Feldman-Lehker/
Trademark Examining Attorney
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
Law Office 111
(571)272-9381
dawn.feldman-lehker@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE