Priority Action

SHADOWMAN

Valiant Entertainment LLC

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88403972 - SHADOWMAN - N/A

To: Valiant Entertainment LLC (nzoubek@rlfllp.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88403972 - SHADOWMAN - N/A
Sent: July 11, 2019 02:32:03 PM
Sent As: ecom124@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application

 

U.S. Application Serial No. 88403972

 

Mark:  SHADOWMAN

 

 

        

 

Correspondence Address: 

       NANCY ZOUBEK

       RITHOLZ LEVY FIELDS LLP

       235 PARK AVENUE SOUTH, THIRD FLOOR

       NEW YORK, NY 10003

      

 

 

 

 

Applicant:  Valiant Entertainment LLC

 

 

 

Reference/Docket No. N/A

 

Correspondence Email Address: 

       nzoubek@rlfllp.com

 

 

 

PRIORITY ACTION

NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION

 

The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned.  Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.

 

 

Issue date:  July 11, 2019

 

 

 

USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found.  The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.

 

Applicant must address issues shown below.  On July 10, 2019, the examining attorney and Nancy Zoubek discussed the issues below.  Applicant must timely respond to these issues.  See 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §2.62(a); TMEP §708.05.

 

Identification of Goods

 

The identification of goods for International Class 24 contains wording that must be clarified because it is too broad and could include goods in other international classes.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. 

 

In particular, the wording “Household textile goods” is overly broad because it could include charms in International Class 20, such as textile window blinds and ornaments, and in International Class 24, such as bed or table linens.

 

Additionally, the wording “blankets” is too broad because it could include a diverse array of blankets, including fire blankets in International Class 9; medical blankets in International Class 10; electric blankets in International Class  12; baby stroller blankets in International Class 12; bed blankets in International Class 24; and yoga blankets in International Class 28.

 

For example, applicant may adopt the following wording, if accurate: 

 

International Class 9: Fire blankets

 

International Class 10: Blankets for medical purposes

 

International Class 11: Electric blankets not for medical use

 

International Class 12: Blankets specially adapted for baby strollers

 

International Class 20: Household textile goods, namely, {specify Class 20 goods, e.g., indoor window blinds of textile, ornaments made of textile};

 

International Class 24: Household textile goods, namely, {specify Class 24 goods, e.g., textile fabrics for use in making household furnishing, textile curtains, textile coasters}; bed linens, namely, bed blankets, bed sheets, bed sheet sets; pillow cases, comforters, duvet covers, pillow shams, bed covers, bedspreads, bed skirts, bed spreads; blankets, namely, {specify Class 24 goods, e.g., bed blankets, blanket throws, children’s blankets, pet blankets}; throws; window curtains; curtains of textile or plastic; diaper changing cloths for babies; diaper changing pads not of paper; place mats, not of paper; plastic table covers; towels; wash clothes; shower curtains; table cloths not of paper; table mats not of paper; textile wall hangings, namely, cloth posters; towels of textile; throw rugs; kitchen linens, namely, dish cloths, kitchen towels

 

International Class 28: Yoga blankets, mediation blankets

 

Applicant’s goods and/or services may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application or as acceptably amended.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06.  Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods and/or services or add goods and/or services not found or encompassed by those in the original application or as acceptably amended.  See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b).  The scope of the goods and/or services sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification.  TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b).  Any acceptable changes to the goods and/or services will further limit scope, and once goods and/or services are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted.  TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual.  See TMEP §1402.04.

 

Multiple-Class Application Requirements

 

The application potentially identifies goods in more than one international class; therefore, applicant must satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(1)       List the goods and/or services by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class.

 

(2)       Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee(s) already paid (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule).  The application identifies goods and/or services that are classified in at least seven classes; however, applicant submitted a fee(s) sufficient for only one class(es).  Applicant must either submit the filing fees for the classes not covered by the submitted fees or restrict the application to the number of classes covered by the fees already paid.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112, 1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

Advisory on Moving Goods and Services between Companion Applications

 

Section 1402.08 of the Trademark Manual of Examining Procedure sets forth the conditions under which, the applicant may amend to move items of goods or services from one application to another if an applicant has filed separate applications to register the same mark.

 

In particular, the application from which the item is to be moved must be filed on or before the filing date of the application to which it is to be moved. TMEP §1408.08.

 

The amendment will be permitted only if some of the goods/services in one application should be classified in a different class and the companion application includes that class.  Id.

 

Moving goods/services between applications in this way may only be done if neither of the marks involved has been approved for publication in the Official Gazette. Id.

 

Goods/services can be moved between applications only in applications filed under §1 or §44 of the Trademark Act.  In applications under §1, the applicant may request to move goods/services under a §1(b) basis to a companion application that includes goods/services in the same class, but which are under a §1(a) basis, or vice versa.  Id.

 

The applicant must file a separate amendment for each application, that is, a request to delete specified goods/services in the application from which they are to be moved, specifying the serial number of the application to which they should be added, and an amendment in the application to which those goods/services are to be added, specifying the serial number of the application from which they are to be moved.  Id.  It is noted that the amendments may be accomplished with an Examiner’s Amendment if both of the subject applications are being handled by the same examining attorney.

 

Response Guidelines

 

For this application to proceed further, applicant must explicitly address each refusal and/or requirement in this Office action.  For a refusal, applicant may provide written arguments and evidence against the refusal, and may have other response options if specified above.  For a requirement, applicant should set forth the changes or statements.  Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

In addition, because applicant filed a TEAS RF application, applicant must respond online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) to avoid incurring an additional fee.  See 37 C.F.R. §2.23(b)(1), (c). 

 

How to respond.  Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.

TEAS PLUS OR TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE:  Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS Plus or TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §§819.02(b), 820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application.  See 37 C.F.R. §§2.22(b), 2.23(b); TMEP §§819, 820.  TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods and/or services.  37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.22(c), 2.23(c); TMEP §§819.04, 820.04.  However, in certain situations, TEAS Plus or TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.  

 

 

 

/April A. Hesik/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 124

(571) 272-4735

april.hesik@uspto.gov

 

 

RESPONSE GUIDANCE

  • Missing the response deadline to this letter will cause the application to abandon.  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  TEAS maintenance or unforeseen circumstances could affect an applicant’s ability to timely respond.  

 

 

 

 

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88403972 - SHADOWMAN - N/A

To: Valiant Entertainment LLC (nzoubek@rlfllp.com)
Subject: U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88403972 - SHADOWMAN - N/A
Sent: July 11, 2019 02:32:04 PM
Sent As: ecom124@uspto.gov
Attachments:

United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

 

USPTO OFFICIAL NOTICE

 

Office Action (Official Letter) has issued

on July 11, 2019 for

U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88403972

 

Your trademark application has been reviewed by a trademark examining attorney.  As part of that review, the assigned attorney has issued an official letter that you must respond to by the specified deadline or your application will be abandoned.  Please follow the steps below.

 

(1)  Read the official letter.

 

(2)  Direct questions about the contents of the Office action to the assigned attorney below. 

 

 

/April A. Hesik/

Examining Attorney

Law Office 124

(571) 272-4735

april.hesik@uspto.gov

 

Direct questions about navigating USPTO electronic forms, the USPTO website, the application process, the status of your application, and/or whether there are outstanding deadlines or documents related to your file to the Trademark Assistance Center (TAC).

 

(3)  Respond within 6 months (or earlier, if required in the Office action) from July 11, 2019, using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS).  The response must be received by the USPTO before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  See the Office action for more information about how to respond.

 

 

 

GENERAL GUIDANCE

·       Check the status of your application periodically in the Trademark Status & Document Retrieval (TSDR) database to avoid missing critical deadlines.

 

·       Update your correspondence email address, if needed, to ensure you receive important USPTO notices about your application.

 

·       Beware of misleading notices sent by private companies about your application.  Private companies not associated with the USPTO use public information available in trademark registrations to mail and email trademark-related offers and notices – most of which require fees.  All official USPTO correspondence will only be emailed from the domain “@uspto.gov.”

 

 

 


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed