To: | Little Spoon, Inc. (ipdocket@clarkhill.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88398369 - PLATES - 53987-385072 |
Sent: | January 29, 2020 10:04:02 AM |
Sent As: | ecom121@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88398369
Mark: PLATES
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Little Spoon, Inc.
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 53987-385072
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: January 29, 2020
In a previous Office action dated July 9, 2019, the trademark examining attorney refused registration of the applied-for mark based on the following: Trademark Act Section 2(d) for a likelihood of confusion with a registered mark, and Trademark Act Section 2(e)(1) for being merely descriptive of applicant’s goods.
Further, applicant was previously provided information regarding pending U.S. Application Serial Nos. 88040164, 88040184, and 88123167, which may present a bar to registration of applicant’s mark based on a likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section 2(d). See 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); 37 C.F.R. §2.83; TMEP §§1208 et seq. In its January 7, 2020 response, applicant argued that the marks in the cited registrations and the pending applications are not likely to cause confusion with applicant’s mark. Applicant also argued that the applied-for mark is not merely descriptive.
U.S. Application Serial Nos. 88040164 and 88040184 have since registered (U.S. Reg. Nos. 5904443 and 5904444, respectively).
The trademark examining attorney has found applicant’s arguments unpersuasive and still believes there may be a likelihood of confusion between applicant’s mark and the marks in both the cited registrations and the cited prior-pending application, should it register. Thus, this application is suspended.
Refusals maintained and continued. The following refusals are maintained and continued:
• Section 2(d) Refusal – Likelihood of Confusion
• Section 2(e)(1) Refusal – Merely Descriptive
See TMEP §713.02. These refusals will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Uka Onuoha/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 121
(571) 270-5781
uka.onuoha@uspto.gov