SLY DOG CO.
Philip G. Ayoub
Mark For: SLY DOG CO.™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 88395533 |
| Mark Literal Elements | SLY DOG CO. |
| Mark Drawing Type | 4 - STANDARD CHARACTER MARK |
| Mark Type | TRADEMARK |
| Register | PRINCIPAL |
| Current Location | TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED 2020-01-22 |
| Basis | 1(b) |
| Class Status | ACTIVE |
| Primary US Classes |
|
| Primary International Class |
|
| Filed Use | No |
| Current Use | No |
| Intent To Use | Yes |
| Filed ITU | Yes |
| 44D Filed | No |
| 44E Current | No |
| 66A Current | No |
| Current Basis | No |
| No Basis | No |
| Attorney Name | Alan F Feeney |
| Attorney Docket Number | TM3490US00 |
| Law Office Assigned | N50 |
| Employee Name | BIACHE, AUBREY ANNE |
Timeline
| 2019-04-22 | Application Filed |
| 2019-06-30 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2019-12-31 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2020-01-02 | Transaction Date |
| 2020-01-22 | Location: TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED |
| 2020-01-22 | Status: A final Office action refusing registration has been sent (issued) because the applicant neither satisfied nor overcame all requ |
Trademark Parties (Applicants & Owners)
| Party: |  Philip G. Ayoub |
| Address | 9 Eagle Way Seekonk, MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES 02771 |
| Legal Entity Type | Individual |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
IC 025. US 022 039. G & S: Baseball caps; Beanies; Tuques; Embroidered clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, hats; Knitted caps; Skull caps; T-shirts
| International Codes: | 25 |
| U.S. Codes: | 022,039 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0251 | Baseball caps; Beanies; Tuques; Embroidered clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, hats; Knitted caps; Skull caps; T-shirts |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Proceeding Number |
|---|---|---|
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2020-02-01 | |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2020-01-22 | |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2020-01-22 | 93409 |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2020-01-22 | |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2019-12-31 | 88889 |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2019-12-30 | |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2019-12-30 | |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2019-12-30 | 88889 |
| TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | 2019-07-12 | |
| NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2019-06-30 | 6325 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2019-06-30 | 93409 |
| NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | 2019-06-30 | 6325 |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2019-06-30 | 93409 |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED IN TRAM | 2019-05-07 | |
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED IN TRAM | 2019-04-25 |
Similar Marks
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Company Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
 SLY DOG CO. 90976494 not registered Live/Pending |
Philip G. Ayoub 2021-08-17 |
 SLY DOG CO. 90887675 not registered Live/Pending |
Philip G. Ayoub 2021-08-17 |
 SLY DOG CO. 88395533 not registered Live/Pending |
Philip G. Ayoub 2019-04-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 