UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) ABOUT APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

 

 

OFFICE ACTION

 

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW. A RESPONSE TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE TRADEMARK ELECTRONIC APPLICATION SYSTEM (TEAS) MUST BE RECEIVED BEFORE MIDNIGHT EASTERN TIME OF THE LAST DAY OF THE RESPONSE PERIOD.

 

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/18/2019

 

The referenced application has been reviewed by the assigned trademark examining attorney.  Applicant must respond timely and completely to the issue below. 15 U.S.C. §1062(b); 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(a), 2.65(a); TMEP §§711, 718.03.

 

SEARCH OF OFFICE’S DATABASE OF MARKS

 

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d).  TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

 

However, applicant must respond to the following requirement.

 

IDENTIFICATION OF GOODS REQUIRES AMENDMENT

 

Applicant has classified “motorcycle gloves” in International Class 9; however, the proper class for these goods is International Class 25. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.32(a)(7), 2.85; TMEP §§1401.02(a), 1401.03(b). Applicant must adopt the appropriate international classification number for the goods identified in the application. The USPTO follows the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks (Nice Classification), established by the World Intellectual Property Organization, to classify goods. See 37 C.F.R. §2.85(a); TMEP §§1401.02, 1401.02(a).

 

Moreover, applicant’s use of the word “protective” in connection with “jackets, coats, sweatshirt, and pants, for use in motorsports” and “shoes and boots, for use in motorsports” creates an ambiguity that must be resolved. See 37 C.F.R. §2.32(a)(6); TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.03. Protective clothing is clothing that protects the wearer from death or severe bodily injury. Thus, the USPTO classifies protective clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation, and fire in International Class 9. However, general clothing items not specifically designed to protect the wearer from death or severe bodily injury are classified in International Class 25, which is why the USPTO classifies such goods as motorcycle boots, motorcycle rain suits, and motorcycle jackets in that class. Here, it is not clear if applicant’s clothing items are “protective” in the sense that they protect against death or severe bodily injury (indeed, it is not clear how a sweatshirt could serve this function), and therefore clarification is required. If the goods do not serve to protect against death or severe bodily injury but are merely meant to be used for a more general protection while riding a motorcycle, applicant should delete the ambiguous word “protective” from the identification.

 

Finally, the wording “gloves, namely, motorcycle” and “helmets, namely, motorcycles” is unclear as to what goods applicant is actually providing, especially when viewed as “gloves, namely, motorcycle and motorcycle gloves” and “helmets, namely, motorcycles and motorcycles helmets.” See TMEP §1402.01. If “gloves, namely, motorcycle” and “helmets, namely, motorcycles” refers to “motorcycle gloves” and “motorcycle helmets,” respectively, then applicant should delete the confusing wording “gloves, namely, motorcycle” and “helmets, namely, motorcycles” because it is redundant and unnecessary, given that applicant lists “motorcycle gloves” and “motorcycle helmets” in the identification. See generally TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(a).

 

The following are suggested formats for the amended identifications of goods:

 

CLASS 9: Motorcycle helmets

 

CLASS 25: Clothing, namely, jackets, coats, sweatshirts, and pants, for use in motorsports; footwear, namely, shoes and boots, for use in motorsports; motorcycle gloves

 

Applicant’s goods may be clarified or limited, but may not be expanded beyond those originally itemized in the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a); TMEP §1402.06. Applicant may clarify or limit the identification by inserting qualifying language or deleting items to result in a more specific identification; however, applicant may not substitute different goods or add goods not found or encompassed by those in the original application. See TMEP §1402.06(a)-(b). The scope of the goods sets the outer limit for any changes to the identification and is generally determined by the ordinary meaning of the wording in the identification. TMEP §§1402.06(b), 1402.07(a)-(b). Any acceptable changes to the goods will further limit scope, and once goods are deleted, they are not permitted to be reinserted. TMEP §1402.07(e).

 

For assistance with identifying and classifying goods in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.

 

ADVISORY: MULTIPLE-CLASS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS

 

The application identifies goods that are classified in at least two classes; however, applicant submitted a fee sufficient for only one class. Therefore, in response to the requirement that applicant amend the identification of goods, applicant must either (1) restrict the amended identification to one class (i.e., the number of classes covered by the fee already paid), or, if classes are added to the application, (2) satisfy all the requirements below for each international class based on Trademark Act Section 1(b):

 

(a)  List the goods by their international class number in consecutive numerical order, starting with the lowest numbered class (as demonstrated above).

 

(b)  Submit a filing fee for each international class not covered by the fee already paid. The fee for adding classes to a TEAS Reduced Fee (RF) application is $275 per class (view the USPTO’s current fee schedule). See more information regarding the requirements for maintaining the lower TEAS RF fee and, if these requirements are not satisfied, for adding classes at a higher fee using regular TEAS.

 

See 15 U.S.C. §§1051(b), 1112; 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(iii), 2.23(a), 2.32(a)(6)-(7), 2.34(a)(2)-(3), 2.86(a); TMEP §§1403.01, 1403.02(c).

 

See an overview of the requirements for a Section 1(b) multiple-class application and how to satisfy the requirements online using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) form.

 

RESPONSE REQUIRED

 

For this application to proceed, applicant must explicitly address the requirement in this Office action by setting forth the necessary changes. Please see “Responding to Office Actions” and the informational video “Response to Office Action” for more information and tips on responding.

 

 

/Andrew Leaser/

Trademark Examining Attorney

Law Office 117

(571) 272-1911

andrew.leaser@uspto.gov

 

 

TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER: Informal communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions and will not be considered; therefore, do not respond to this Office action by telephone or e-mail. Instead, go to http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp to file a formal response using the “Response to Examining Attorney Office Action” form. Please wait 48-72 hours from the issue/mailing date before using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS), to allow for necessary system updates of the application. For technical assistance with online forms, e-mail TEAS@uspto.gov. 

 

For questions about the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney. All informal communications relevant to this application will be placed in the official application record.

 

TEAS REDUCED FEE (TEAS RF) APPLICANTS – TO MAINTAIN LOWER FEE, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET, INCLUDING SUBMITTING DOCUMENTS ONLINE: Applicants who filed their application online using the lower-fee TEAS RF application form must (1) file certain documents online using TEAS, including responses to Office actions (see TMEP §820.02(b) for a complete list of these documents); (2) maintain a valid e-mail correspondence address; and (3) agree to receive correspondence from the USPTO by e-mail throughout the prosecution of the application. See 37 C.F.R. §2.23(b); TMEP §820. TEAS RF applicants who do not meet these requirements must submit an additional processing fee of $125 per class of goods. 37 C.F.R. §§2.6(a)(1)(v), 2.23(c); TMEP §820.04. However, in certain situations, TEAS RF applicants may respond to an Office action by authorizing an examiner’s amendment by telephone or e-mail without incurring this additional fee.

 

WHO MUST SIGN THE RESPONSE:  It must be personally signed by an individual applicant or someone with legal authority to bind an applicant (i.e., a corporate officer, a general partner, all joint applicants).  If an applicant is represented by an attorney, the attorney must sign the response. 

 

PERIODICALLY CHECK THE STATUS OF THE APPLICATION:  To ensure that applicant does not miss crucial deadlines or official notices, check the status of the application every three to four months using the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system at http://tsdr.gov.uspto.report/.  Please keep a copy of the TSDR status screen.  If the status shows no change for more than six months, contact the Trademark Assistance Center by e-mail at TrademarkAssistanceCenter@uspto.gov or call 1-800-786-9199.  For more information on checking status, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/.

 

TO UPDATE CORRESPONDENCE/E-MAIL ADDRESS:  Use the TEAS form at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/correspondence.jsp.

 

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)

 

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING YOUR

U.S. TRADEMARK APPLICATION

 

USPTO OFFICE ACTION (OFFICIAL LETTER) HAS ISSUED

ON 6/18/2019 FOR U.S. APPLICATION SERIAL NO. 88371997

 

Please follow the instructions below:

 

(1)  TO READ THE LETTER:  Click on this link or go to http://tsdr.uspto.gov,enter the U.S. application serial number, and click on “Documents.”

 

The Office action may not be immediately viewable, to allow for necessary system updates of the application, but will be available within 24 hours of this e-mail notification.

 

(2)  TIMELY RESPONSE IS REQUIRED:  Please carefully review the Office action to determine (1) how to respond, and (2) the applicable response time period.  Your response deadline will be calculated from 6/18/2019 (or sooner if specified in the Office action).  A response transmitted through the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS) must be received before midnight Eastern Time of the last day of the response period.  For information regarding response time periods, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/process/status/responsetime.jsp.

 

Do NOT hit “Reply” to this e-mail notification, or otherwise e-mail your response because the USPTO does NOT accept e-mails as responses to Office actions.  Instead, the USPTO recommends that you respond online using the TEAS response form located at http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/teas/response_forms.jsp.

 

(3)  QUESTIONS:  For questions about the contents of the Office action itself, please contact the assigned trademark examining attorney.  For technical assistance in accessing or viewing the Office action in the Trademark Status and Document Retrieval (TSDR) system, please e-mail TSDR@uspto.gov.

 

WARNING

 

Failure to file the required response by the applicable response deadline will result in the ABANDONMENT of your application.  For more information regarding abandonment, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/basics/abandon.jsp.

 

PRIVATE COMPANY SOLICITATIONS REGARDING YOUR APPLICATION:  Private companies not associated with the USPTO are using information provided in trademark applications to mail or e-mail trademark-related solicitations.  These companies often use names that closely resemble the USPTO and their solicitations may look like an official government document.  Many solicitations require that you pay “fees.” 

 

Please carefully review all correspondence you receive regarding this application to make sure that you are responding to an official document from the USPTO rather than a private company solicitation.  All official USPTO correspondence will be mailed only from the “United States Patent and Trademark Office” in Alexandria, VA; or sent by e-mail from the domain “@uspto.gov.”  For more information on how to handle private company solicitations, see http://www.gov.uspto.report/trademarks/solicitation_warnings.jsp.