To: | Panasonic Corporation (trademark@hsml.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88298751 - PANASONIC LIFE SOLUTIONS - 8279.1993US0 |
Sent: | November 13, 2019 08:04:52 AM |
Sent As: | ecom103@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88298751
Mark: PANASONIC LIFE SOLUTIONS
|
|
Correspondence Address: HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C. |
|
Applicant: Panasonic Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 8279.1993US0
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
SUSPENSION NOTICE
No Response Required
Issue date: November 13, 2019
This suspension letter is in response to applicant’s communication filed on October 9, 2019.
The application is suspended for the reason(s) specified below. See 37 C.F.R. §2.67; TMEP §§716 et seq.
Application suspended until submission of foreign registration or proof that foreign registration was renewed. Applicant is required to provide a copy of a foreign registration from applicant’s country of origin; the foreign registration must be valid when the U.S. registration issues. 15 U.S.C. §1126(e); 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii); TMEP §§1004, 1004.01(a). Action on the application is suspended until the USPTO receives a copy of such foreign registration or proof that the foreign registration was renewed. TMEP §§716.02(b), 1003.04. Applicant must also provide an English translation if the foreign registration or renewal document is not in English. 37 C.F.R. §2.34(a)(3)(ii)-(iii).
If the foreign application abandons or the foreign registration is not renewed, applicant should promptly notify the trademark examining attorney. See TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a). In such case, applicant may amend the application to rely on another filing basis, if appropriate, and will retain the priority filing date, if applicable. TMEP §§1003.08, 1004.01(a).
Prior-Filed Applications. In the previous Office action, applicant was also provided information regarding U.S. Application Serial Nos. 87228246, 87380898, and 88288526, however, applicant has provided evidence of ownership of the marks. Thus, the possible bar to registration of applicant’s mark based on a likelihood of confusion under Trademark Act Section 2(d) is obviated.
Requirement(s) maintained and continued. The following requirement(s) is/are maintained and continued:
• Identification of Goods and Services
o In the previous Office action applicant was required to clarify indefinite and overly broad wording in the identification of goods and services. Applicant responded by amending the identification of goods and services, however, additional amendments are required because the identification still includes wording that requires further clarification. In addition, applicant has amended the identification to include particular wording that is beyond the scope of the original identification in the U.S. application.
See TMEP §713.02. This requirement(s) will be made final once this application is removed from suspension, unless a new issue arises. See TMEP §716.01.
Suspension process. The USPTO will periodically check this application to determine if it should remain suspended. See TMEP §716.04. As needed, the trademark examining attorney will issue a letter to applicant to inquire about the status of the reason for the suspension. TMEP §716.05.
No response required. Applicant may file a response, but is not required to do so.
/Chioma (Bata) Oputa/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 103
571-272-5234
chioma.oputa@uspto.gov