NOTE TO THE FILE
SERIAL NUMBER: 88287331
DATE: 04/25/2019
NAME: gulrich
NOTE:
Searched:
Lexis/Nexis
OneLook
Wikipedia
Acronym Finder Protest evidence reviewed
Other:Checked:
Geographic significance
Surname
Translation
ID with ID/CLASS mailboxChecked list of approved Canadian attorneys and agents
Discussed file with
Attorney/Applicant via:
phone Left message with
X email Attorney/ApplicantRequested Law Library search Issued Examiner’s Amendment
for: and entered changes in TRADEUPSPRINT DO NOT PRINT Added design code in TRADEUPS
Description of the mark
Translation statement Re-imaged standard character
drawing
Negative translation statement
Consent of living individual Contacted TM MADRID ID/CLASS
about misclassified definite ID
Changed TRADEUPS to:
Dear Mr. Schmidt:
As noted in the issued Office action, “E-mail communications will not be accepted as responses to Office actions.” Therefore, you will need to formally file your response if you do not wish for your application to go abandoned. If you need assistance navigating the online response forms, please contact the Trademark Assistance Center. See, http://www.gov.uspto.report/learning-and-resources/support-centers/trademark-assistance-center.
Please note that the identification provided, below, remains unacceptable for the reasons noted in the Office action. Additionally, in relation to the additional information required about the mark, you must respond to the questions posed.
Because of the legal technicalities and strict deadlines involved in the USPTO application process, applicant may wish to hire a private attorney specializing in trademark matters to represent applicant in this process and provide legal advice. Although the undersigned trademark examining attorney is permitted to help an applicant understand the contents of an Office action as well as the application process in general, no USPTO attorney or staff is permitted to give an applicant legal advice or statements about an applicant’s legal rights. TMEP §§705.02, 709.06. For attorney referral information, applicant may consult the American Bar Association’s Consumers’ Guide to Legal Help; an online directory of legal professionals, such as FindLaw®; or a local telephone directory. The USPTO, however, may not assist an applicant in the selection of a private attorney. 37 C.F.R. §2.11.
Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 113
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
T: 571.272.1951 | gretchen.ulrich@uspto.gov
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: kraspec [mailto:kraspec@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2019 8:42 PM
To: Ulrich, Gretchen <gretchen.ulrich@USPTO.GOV>
Subject: Office Action Response for Serial#88287331 KRASPEC
Hello,
I hope this is acceptable to email you directly. I was having trouble trying to respond through the uspto.gov website.
This is the first time I’ve applied for a trademark and I want to follow all the rules and regulations so please forgive me if I miss something.
I will try to answer the summary of issues the best I can.
Requirement: Definite identification of services
I’d like to provide Voice Acting services under this name. Also try to sell related voice acting products through a website with the same name.
Advisory: Multiclass application requirements
I wasn’t sure what this meant so I looked it up on the uspto.gov website.
I think I’m a Class 9. It appeared to be the closes definition.
Requirement: Additional information about the mark
I’m trying to create a brand with the name “kraspec” and would like to try and protect it with a trademark.
I hope my responses are acceptable. Please feel free to contact me directly with any additional questions you may have.
Thank you!
Brian Schmidt
414-841-5666
Virus-free. www.avast.com