Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
Input Field |
Entered |
---|---|
SERIAL NUMBER | 88271379 |
LAW OFFICE ASSIGNED | LAW OFFICE 120 |
MARK SECTION | |
MARK | http://uspto.report/TM/88271379/mark.png |
LITERAL ELEMENT | CLARO |
STANDARD CHARACTERS | YES |
USPTO-GENERATED IMAGE | YES |
MARK STATEMENT | The mark consists of standard characters, without claim to any particular font style, size or color. |
ARGUMENT(S) | |
This is in response to the Office Action dated March 15, 2019.
The Trademark Examining Attorney has made Section 2(d) refusals. Initially, it is noted that Application Serial No. 87/344,598 has been abandoned, thus mooting this provisional refusal.
The refusals based on Registration Nos. 5,221,043 (CLAROR) and 3,003,490 (ACLARO) are respectfully traversed. Applicant’s mark CLARO has a different pronunciation, commercial impression and meaning than the marks in the cited registrations. Also, Applicant’s mark is used for a light emitting device (in Class 10) whereas the marks in the cited registration are used for skin care preparations in Class 5. Notwithstanding the evidence the Trademark Examining Attorney has provided, the differences between the Applicant’s mark and the marks in the cited registrations will be enough to avoid any likelihood of confusion. The evidence the Trademark Examining Attorney presented shows use of EXACT marks on devices, and preparations. This is not the situation in this case.
As for Registration No. 3,846,433, upon information and belief, Applicant believes that this mark has been abandoned. Applicant has filed a Petition to Cancel this registration, Cancellation Proceeding No. 92072256 . Applicant respectfully requests SUSPENSION of this application pending the resolution of the Cancellation Petition.
Based on the above, the only issue remaining in this application is the Section 2(d) refusal based on Registration No. 3,846,433. Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the other Section 2(d) refusals, and SUSPENSION of this application pending the disposition of Cancellation Proceeding No. 92072256. |
|
ATTORNEY SECTION (current) | |
NAME | David V. Radack |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | NOT SPECIFIED |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | NOT SPECIFIED |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | NOT SPECIFIED |
FIRM NAME | ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC |
STREET | 600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOOR |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15219 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 412-566-6777 |
FAX | 412-566-6099 |
dradack@eckertseamans.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 305276-00115 |
ATTORNEY SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | David V. Radack |
ATTORNEY BAR MEMBERSHIP NUMBER | XXX |
YEAR OF ADMISSION | XXXX |
U.S. STATE/ COMMONWEALTH/ TERRITORY | XX |
FIRM NAME | ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC |
STREET | 600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOOR |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15219 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 412-566-6777 |
FAX | 412-566-6099 |
dradack@eckertseamans.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 305276-00115 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (current) | |
NAME | DAVID V. RADACK |
FIRM NAME | ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC |
STREET | 600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOOR |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15219 |
COUNTRY | US |
PHONE | 412-566-6777 |
FAX | 412-566-6099 |
dradack@eckertseamans.com; ipmail@eckertseamans.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 305276-00115 |
CORRESPONDENCE SECTION (proposed) | |
NAME | David V. Radack |
FIRM NAME | ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC |
STREET | 600 GRANT STREET, 44TH FLOOR |
CITY | PITTSBURGH |
STATE | Pennsylvania |
POSTAL CODE | 15219 |
COUNTRY | United States |
PHONE | 412-566-6777 |
FAX | 412-566-6099 |
dradack@eckertseamans.com; ipmail@eckertseamans.com | |
AUTHORIZED TO COMMUNICATE VIA EMAIL | Yes |
DOCKET/REFERENCE NUMBER | 305276-00115 |
SIGNATURE SECTION | |
RESPONSE SIGNATURE | /David V. Radack/ |
SIGNATORY'S NAME | David V. Radack |
SIGNATORY'S POSITION | Attorney of Record, PA Bar Member |
SIGNATORY'S PHONE NUMBER | 412-566-6777 |
DATE SIGNED | 09/12/2019 |
AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY | YES |
FILING INFORMATION SECTION | |
SUBMIT DATE | Thu Sep 12 15:00:38 EDT 2019 |
TEAS STAMP | USPTO/ROA-XXX.XXX.XXX.XX- 20190912150038412868-8827 1379-6104f54a43351ad2d4bf 623e230a29d697c7784483902 bfb74c5ed731d7744e915-N/A -N/A-20190912145902414374 |
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB control number. PTO Form 1957 (Rev 10/2011) |
OMB No. 0651-0050 (Exp 09/20/2020) |
This is in response to the Office Action dated March 15, 2019.
The Trademark Examining Attorney has made Section 2(d) refusals. Initially, it is noted that Application Serial No. 87/344,598 has been abandoned, thus mooting this provisional refusal.
The refusals based on Registration Nos. 5,221,043 (CLAROR) and 3,003,490 (ACLARO) are respectfully traversed. Applicant’s mark CLARO has a different pronunciation, commercial impression and meaning than the marks in the cited registrations. Also, Applicant’s mark is used for a light emitting device (in Class 10) whereas the marks in the cited registration are used for skin care preparations in Class 5. Notwithstanding the evidence the Trademark Examining Attorney has provided, the differences between the Applicant’s mark and the marks in the cited registrations will be enough to avoid any likelihood of confusion. The evidence the Trademark Examining Attorney presented shows use of EXACT marks on devices, and preparations. This is not the situation in this case.
As for Registration No. 3,846,433, upon information and belief, Applicant believes that this mark has been abandoned. Applicant has filed a Petition to Cancel this registration, Cancellation Proceeding No. 92072256 . Applicant respectfully requests SUSPENSION of this application pending the resolution of the Cancellation Petition.
Based on the above, the only issue remaining in this application is the Section 2(d) refusal based on Registration No. 3,846,433. Applicant respectfully requests withdrawal of the other Section 2(d) refusals, and SUSPENSION of this application pending the disposition of Cancellation Proceeding No. 92072256.