To: | Sony Corporation (bhipdocket@bakerlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88254224 - SECURITAINMENT - 41279.3186 |
Sent: | November 06, 2020 03:27:30 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88254224
Mark: SECURITAINMENT
|
|
Correspondence Address: 45 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA, 14TH FLOOR
|
|
Applicant: Sony Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 41279.3186
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
NONFINAL OFFICE ACTION
The USPTO must receive applicant’s response to this letter within six months of the issue date below or the application will be abandoned. Respond using the Trademark Electronic Application System (TEAS). A link to the appropriate TEAS response form appears at the end of this Office action.
Issue date: November 06, 2020
The instant application was reviewed and approved by the undersigned examining attorney during the regular examination period, and was approved for publication on November 21, 2020. However, due to an external review, it was determined that additional changes to the language is necessary. Thus, the approval of publication was withdrawn on November 5, 2020
Upon further review, the following requirement is made. The examining attorney regrets the untimely nature of the request.
In Class 9, the wording “entertainment robots for domestic use” and “entertainment robots for nursing care facilities” are indefinite and overbroad and must be clarified. Robots are classified based on their function, with the sole exception of “humanoid robots with artificial intelligence. Here, the identified robots provide functions that potentially identify robots in multiple classes, for example, humanoid robots with artificial intelligence for domestic use in the nature of entertainment in Class 9 and toy robots for entertainment in nursing care facilities in Class 28.
In addition, the term “monitoring robots for household use and professional use excluding those for industrial, medical or hobby use” is unclear and must be clarified. The nature of what the robots are monitoring must be further clarified to properly classify the robots. For example, if the robots are in the nature of self-driving delivery robots that monitor traffic routes, the robots are classified in Class 12. Please clarify the goods and, if necessary, reclassify the goods, as discussed herein.
Please note that the goods and services in Classes 28, 42, 44, and 45 are acceptable.
For assistance with identifying and classifying goods and services in trademark applications, please see the USPTO’s online searchable U.S. Acceptable Identification of Goods and Services Manual. See TMEP §1402.04.
How to respond. Click to file a response to this nonfinal Office action.
/Susan Leslie DuBois/
Examining Attorney
Law Office 111
571.272.9154
susan.dubois@uspto.gov
RESPONSE GUIDANCE