To: | Sony Corporation (bhipdocket@bakerlaw.com) |
Subject: | U.S. Trademark Application Serial No. 88254224 - SECURITAINMENT - 41279.3186 |
Sent: | March 25, 2020 05:54:42 PM |
Sent As: | ecom111@uspto.gov |
Attachments: |
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
Office Action (Official Letter) About Applicant’s Trademark Application
U.S. Application Serial No. 88254224
Mark: SECURITAINMENT
|
|
Correspondence Address: |
|
Applicant: Sony Corporation
|
|
Reference/Docket No. 41279.3186
Correspondence Email Address: |
|
EXAMINER’S AMENDMENT
Issue date: March 25, 2020
USPTO database searched; no conflicting marks found. The trademark examining attorney searched the USPTO database of registered and pending marks and found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). 15 U.S.C. §1052(d); TMEP §704.02.
Application has been amended as shown below. Based on TMEP Section 707.02, the examining attorney has amended the application as shown below. Please notify the examining attorney immediately of any objections by telephone or e-mail. TMEP §707. Otherwise, no response is required. Id. In addition, applicant is advised that amendments to the goods and/or services are permitted only if they clarify or limit them; amendments that add to or broaden the scope of the goods and/or services are not permitted. 37 C.F.R. §2.71(a).
The identification of goods is amended to read as follows:
“Design and development of robots, data processing equipment, computers and computer programs; robotics engineering services; cloud computing featuring software for use in operating robots; rental of computers; providing computer programs for use in operating robots on data networks” in International Class 42. See TMEP §§1402.01, 1402.01(e).
Note;
Omission inserted for accuracy and definiteness. Function of programs omitted.
Other identifications are acceptable.
RESPONSE GUIDELINES
Please call or email the assigned trademark examining attorney with questions about this Office action. Although an examining attorney cannot provide legal advice, the examining attorney can provide additional explanation about the refusal(s) and/or requirement(s) in this Office action. See TMEP §§705.02, 709.06.
The USPTO does not accept emails as responses to Office actions; however, emails can be used for informal communications and are included in the application record. See 37 C.F.R. §§2.62(c), 2.191; TMEP §§304.01-.02, 709.04-.05.
/Zachary Bello/
Attorney Advisor
Law Office 111
USPTO
571-272-9376
zack.bello@uspto.gov